– or –
Please login or register to participate.
.
 
+

Recycling We preserve our planet for future generations
We preserve our planet for future generations!
We are trying to create an international fund for nature conservation.

It does not matter where there is a struggle for the environment in America, Canada, Germany or Russia.

All this is our land!
Today, the volumes of hazardous waste processing in Russia are quite small as a percentage of the volume of raw materials compared to European countries. What negatively affects the whole planet Earth!

For example in European countries, the level of processing reaches an average of 90% annually generated / used tires. In Russia today, the volume of discarded worn tires is about 900 thousand tons per year. The volume of recycling of old tires does not exceed 20% of the total annual tire waste. Up to 20% of used tires are burned. The remaining tires are disposed of in landfills or buried. According to experts, by 2020 the volume produced annually by Russian tire wastes may reach as early as 1 million tonnes per year.

In recent years, the volume of used tires grew by 4%, which is associated with an increase in the number of cars in Russia.

Governments hide, but it affects the ecology of our entire land!
FOUNDATION GOALS UNTIL 2025 OF THE YEAR CREATING:
200+
Garbage recycling plants
200+
Used tire recycling plants
200+
Used car recycling plants
 With your help! We will make an invaluable contribution.

In preserving our land for posterity!
https://fundrazr.com/Recycling?ref=ab_c8YJb4
The collected funds will be used to create a fund (legal entity), opening bank accounts, obtaining licenses, office acquisition.

Rating
+1
Last created by Recycling
Oct 20, 2019 11:49 AM
+

janissuipe Deliberate ketazine spill. ~1000 tons. How dangerous is this?
During April and May approximately 500 to 1000 metric tons of chemical waste was spilled in 20 places, mostly onto rural dirt roads, on the side of wheat fields or in a ditch next to dirt roads.
This fact was made public at the end of May, the delay was so that the police could catch the truck driver. They did, he's under arrest. The preliminary analysis of the VVD (Our EPA) stated that the pollutant is possibly ketazine a byproduct of POROFOR (AZODICARBONAMIDE) manufacturing.
Here are some videos of the spill:
The videos contain the info I have laid out here.
https://www.facebook.com/pl[…]ideos%2F2215514648544196%2F
https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/z[…]e_ffjpdPrmgWMAWDUnTWRr1ryKI
Map of the spills:
http://www.vvd.gov.lv/[…]/bilde%20Evita%20gatava.png
The pollutant is brownish and when evaporates makes brownish crystals. During these past two months it has evaporated or seeped into the ground leaving scorched dead plants and small animals. The VVD say that this stuff is a localized pollution that does not affect the groundwater or anything else and most of it must have "harmlessly evaporated". No cleanup has been made and there was only a plea from the gov. VVD to the alleged polluting factory to clean it up. At first they had no comment then they started to deny everything. Considering that they are the ONLY factory with ketazine as byproduct in this country and possibly the neighboring too, it may be pretty obvious who's the guilty one.
These are the "alleged" polluters and their production portfolio.
http://www.biolar.lv/en/products.html
Our VVD ir understaffed and underpaid (what a shocker) and possibly corrupt. Tomorrow is the press conference fortunately with lab results determining exactly which chemical it is and I'm planing on attending it and asking some tough questions, with your help of course.
So if you could chime in with your expertise on some of the official version.
1) Is ketazine really a waste product and not something that has value or application?
2) Is ketazine a byproduct of POROFOR (AZODICARBONAMIDE) manufacturing?
3) How cancerous/dangerous is it?
4) What cleanup should have been made?
5) What measurements and controls should be done to check soil, groundwater.
6) This is in EU, which agency has cleanup guidelines or to whom can we complain.
7) How to get the polluter by the balls.
TL;DR;
Deliberate ketazine spill. How dangerous is this? Cleanup guidelines.

It would mean a lot if You could answer any of these questions or point to the right direction. Thanks.

Rating
+1
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 01, 2019 11:48 AM
Rating
+1
Last discussed by EEA
Jun 19, 2019 09:49 AM
+

valerie Hi, I'm a sales manager at a household appliances manufacturer headquartered in Hangzhou, China.
It has come to our attention recently that from July 22 of this year (“effective date”), the restrictions on four new types of substances (DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP) and their maximum concentration values tolerated, which set forth by Annex II of 2015/863 (“RoHS 2.0”), will come into effect. In order to ensure our compliance with RoHS 2.0, we sincerely hope that the competent authority will provide some guidance on our questions as follows.
1. Assuming that some of our non-compliant products (for example, contain DIBP more than 0.1%) have been sold to local importers and distributors, but not been made available for customers on the Union market yet. After the effective date,
1.1 Is it legal for the importers and distributors to sell those non-compliant products?
1.2 If it is illegal to continue to sell, who will be responsible to withdraw those non-compliant products? Manufacturer, importer or distributor?
1.3 If it is illegal to continue to sell, what kinds of measures might be taken by competent authorities upon manufacturer, importer and distributor respectively? In particular, under what circumstances will the economic operators be required to recall the product or pay the penalties?
2. Our European maintenance center is located at Netherland. After the effective date, some products sold before the effective date will be sent to the maintenance center for repair service. Will it be legal for our maintenance center to use non-compliant spare parts to replace the old ones on such products?
3. After the effective date, some products sold before the effective date will be sent back to Hangzhou factory for replacement service. Will it be legal for our Hangzhou factory to send a non-compliant product back to the customer on the Union market?

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Mar 19, 2019 11:34 AM
 
Loading