– or –
Please login or register to participate.
.
 
+

Benedict Hello,

Great data on GHG emissions in the EU by sector, thanks for that.
http://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/assessment

Can you clear two things up for me? Presumably GHG emissions in the Residential/Commerical sector come uniquely from energy consumption. What's the difference then with the Energy Supply sector (are we talking about gas burnt in buildings vs electricity/heat generated outside of them)? More importantly, is there any way of quantifying what share of of the energy contributing to Energy Supply emissions is consumed by the Residential/Commerical, Industry, and Transport sectors?

Thanks.

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Feb 06, 2017 09:55 AM
+

meyull Schon heute wäre eine weitgehende Deckung des Strombedarfs in Europa durch Offshore-Windenergie möglich, die zu Kosten von weniger als 3 Cent/kWh erzeugt werden kann.
Diese Möglichkeit habe ich in einer Konzeption dargelegt.
Bei den Kosten für Material, Herstellung und Montage ist dieses Konzept konkurrierenden Projekten und Konzepten überlegen und da die Anlagen nahezu vollständig recycelbar sind, ist das Konzept auch nachhaltig.
Warum wagt keiner der Experten für Windenergieanlagen eine Diskussion mit mir?
Warum kneifen alle?
Worum geht es bei dieser Diskussion?
Ich bin der Meinung, dass die gegenwärtig eingesetzten WEA nicht optimal sind.
Was finde ich ungenügend?
Alle Laufräder / Rotoren von Dampf-, Gas- und Wasserturbinen, wie auch die Flugzeugtriebwerke haben Rotorblätter mit einer Verwindung und der Rotorkreis ist nahezu vollständig mit Rotorblättern besetzt. Dem gegenüber besitzen die Rotoren von Windturbinen nur 2-3 Rotorblätter ohne signifikante Verwindung, die nur als Ganzes gedreht werden können. Warum unterscheiden sie sich so wesentlich von den Rotoren der anderen Strömungsturbinen?
Ich bin der Meinung, dass dies der Tatsache geschuldet ist, dass man kein Rotorblatt mit steuerbarer Verwindung in der benötigten Länge herstellen kann. Die Rotorblätter haben keine signifikante Verwindung, weil sie dann bei Windgeschwindigkeiten oberhalb der zulässigen Windgeschwindigkeit immer schneller würden und dies schließlich zu Schäden führen würde. Das Profil in Nabennähe ist nahezu kreisförmig und damit keinesfalls aerodynamisch optimal, doch man braucht diesen kreisförmigen Querschnitt, weil nur der die notwendige Steifigkeit liefert. Mehr als drei Rotorblätter sind nicht sinnvoll, weil schon diese drei den Platz an der Nabe voll ausfüllen. Bei einem 4. Rotorblatt müsste die Nabe deutlich größer sein und da ging Fläche verloren, der zusätzlliche Gewinn würde die zusätzlichen Kosten (etwa 200.000 Euro) nicht rechtfertigen. Form und Profil der Rotorblätter sind ein Kompromiss und dabei haben die Festigkeitsforderungen die höhere Priorität. In der derzeitigen Bauart sind Rotordurchmesser von mehr als 200 m kaum möglich, da man schon jetzt bei den Materialien das festeste und steifste Material (kohlefaserverstärktes Kompositmaterial) einsetzt.
Da man bei der eingesetzten Bauart überall an Grenzen stößt, habe ich ein Konzept erarbeitet, welches all diese Nachteile vermeidet. Der Rotor wird aus zwei Komponenten zusammengesetzt, wobei die mechanischen Anforderungen vom einem Speichenrad erfüllt werden. Jeder kennt Rennräder und weiß welch hohen Belastungen diese standhalten und dabei sehr leicht sind. Riesenräder mit Durchmessern von mehr als 160 m baut man heute schon mit herkömmlichen Konstruktionsmaterialien (Stahl). Entwicklungen von 200 m Durchmesser wurden sind bekannt.
Auf diesen Speichen sitzen dann die eigentlichen Rotorblätter, die dann nur gering mechanisch belastet werden, weil sie sofort alle auf sie einwirkenden Kräfte an die Speiche abgeben. Solche Rotorblätter können daher eine steuerbare Verwindung aufweisen und von der Nabe bis zum äußeren Ring ein aerodynamisch optimales Profil besitzen. Auch die Anzahl der Rotorblätter wird nun nicht durch die Festigkeit bestimmt, sondern allein durch die Aerodynamik.
Einen weiteren Vorteil bieten solche Ringrotoren, denn der Ring kann den Generator direkt antreiben und macht daher ein Getriebe überflüssig.
Welcher Experte mag sich dazu äußern? Ich würde mich sehr darüber freuen.
In einer zweiten Diskussionsrunde könnte man dann die Stabilität von WEA auf dem offenen Meer betrachten, auch da habe ich Kritik und Lösungsvorschläge zu bieten. Die oben genannten Kosten sind mit schwimmenden WEA zu erreichen, die sich auf dem offenen Ozean befinden. Ein schneller und kostengünstiger Transport der Energie über mehr als 2000 km ist Bestandteil des Konzeptes.

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Sep 19, 2016 09:13 AM
+

SV1GZ To: U.N. , European Authorities , International & National Nuclear Energy Authorities , Embassies of Nations , Criminal Prosecutors , Interpol , Europol, Others...
Κοινοποίηση πρός Εισαγγελείες[Α.Π.+Εφετών+Πρωτοδικών] Αθηνών+Ε.Υ.Π.+Ελλην. Αστυνομία

From: Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear Fission(Applied+ Theoretically), Mikras Asias 13,Agios Nikolaos,Anavissou,19013 Attiki,Greece,
 tel+fax:+30-2291055275 , Wednesday-17-August-2016

VERY APPROXIMATE,QUANTITATIVE,VERIFICATION OF THE INTUITIVELY ESTIMATION OF ABOUT HUNDRED MILLIONS TO BILLION(S)? HUMAN DEATHS, IF A NUCLEAR FISSION REACTOR EXPLODE AS NUCLEAR BOMB! IN A NUCLEAR PLANT OF ABOUT 4x1000 MWe (OF FOUR NUCLEAR FISSION REACTORS )...
Your reference is my previous article of Tuesday-9-August-2016 with title “ ULTRA VITAL CONSIDERATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR SAFETY & SECURITY...”
(Study carefully the scientific article “Theoretically and under very special applied conditions a nuclear fission reactor may explode as
nuclear bomb...” by Joseph-Christos Kondylakis , 2010 , that exist in the Internet site :
http://nuclpart.phys.uoa.gr/HNPS/Files/ANP2010.pdf )

A-Consideration : The planet Earth surface is about 5.1 x 10 exponent[14] square meters , and the atmosphere layer of the lower 10 Km is about 5.1 x 10 exponent[18] cubic meters . A human breath about 20 cubic meters air per day and in 50 years he/she breath about 3.65 x 10 exponent[5] cubic meters. A population of planet Earth of 6 Billions in 50 years breath about 2 x 10 exponent[15] cubic meters of air , viz about 0.5 x 10 exponent[-3] of the lower 10 Km atmosphere of planet Earth. A Nuclear Fission Plant with 4 Nuclear Reactors, each producing 1000 MWe has with its 4 Storage places(pool & dry) of used nuclear fuel about 20 Tones of Plutonium(Pu) or 2x10 exponent[13] micrograms of Pu and 1 microgram of Pu if inhalled by a human may cause Cancer!...Therefore a 6 Billion population of planet Earth in 50 years will breath about 2x10 exponent[13] / 0.5 x exponent[3] = 4 x exponent[10] viz about 40 Billions Cancer “units”/”deaths” !!!...

B-Consideration : One pool of storage of used nuclear fuel of a Nuclear Fission Reactor of about 1000 MWe contains MORE Radioactivity than this which was released in northern hemisphere from ALL of the Nuclear Weapons tests,Compined... [Reference: “Nuclear Plant Security” by USA'Congress Senate Committee on Environment & Public work,2002, page 110]
The CANCER disease very much increased because of Nuclear Weapons tested in atmosphere , and this effects Billions of Humans....IF a Nuclear Fission Reactor of 1000 MWe explode in a Nuclear Fission Plant of 4 Nuclear Reactors , Four(4) used Nuclear Fuel Storage places(wet & dry) will go to atmospheric circulation All over the planet Earth,stratospherically, with the Plutonium in inhalled particles sizes...

C-Consideration : The Chernobyl Nuclear Accident,USSR,1986 caused until 2009 about 1 Millions Deaths [Reference: Alexey V. Yablakov , et all ,” Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for the People and the Environment “ , in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,USA, 2009 ] and only about 5% of its Plutonium went outside the plant and most of it in NON inhalled size particles and not very far because of the fire dispersion and NOT of nuclear explosion...Imagine now a Nuclear Accident when All plutonium(100%) of the Nuclear Core AND of the Storage places of the PLANT (possibly with 4 Nuclear Reactors) will go to Stratospheric circulation All over the planet Earth , in Inhalled sizes particles of Pu , viz about 20x20 = 400 more Deadly Pu than the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident...

Your further references are our previous+future relevant communications + other references...

This article is devoted in the RESPONSIBILITY!!! of NUCLEAR HUMAN MANAGEMENT + NUCLEAR HUMAN FACTOR AND in the RESPONSIBILITY!!! OF ALL! RELEVANT AUTHORITIES...
Ιδιαιτέρως το αφιερώνω εις την ΥΠΕΥΘΥΝΟΤΗΤΑ!!! των Προέδρου + Εισαγγελέως του Αρείου Πάγου και εις το Σύστημα της Δικαιοσύνης[Δικαστήρια+Αστυνομία+Ε.Υ.Π.] & εις την Διεθνή Δικαιοσύνη...

To: I.C.C.'Prosecutor,European Authorities,Embassies of Nations,International “Atomic”(NUCLEAR) Energy Agency,Euratom,Interpol,Europol,Eurojust,Others...
Κοινοποίηση πρός Εισαγγελείες[Α.Π.+Εφετών+Πρωτοδικών] Αθηνών+Ε.Υ.Π.+Ελλην. Αστυνομία

From: Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear Fission(Applied+ Theoretically),former Manager of Systems Design & Development in Canada,etc, creator of the original fundamental scientific articles “Theoretically and under very special applied conditions a nuclear fission reactor may explode as nuclear bomb...” and “The Unified theory of oncology” & others, postal address: Mikras Asias 13,Agios Nikolaos,Anavissou,19013 Attiki,Greece,tel+fax:+30-2291055275 , Friday-26-August-2016

                                                       Dear Sir(s) or Madam(s)

THEY CREATE BIG PROBLEMS TO ME WHICH PUT BIG BARRIERS TO ME TO WORK ON SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON VITAL THEMES AS IN THE INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR SAFETY OF EXTREME SEVERE NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS, IN THEORETICAL ONCOLOGY WHICH CAN GUIDE & ACCELERATE THE APPLIED ONCOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND IN OTHER FIELDS...

[1] By Violating the Order from May 2015 of the Prosecutor of Criminal court who ordered my pension organization I.K.A. to start giving my pension into 20 days ,because I work in Vital themes of International Nuclear Safety , they have me,Illegaly, for more than 20 months! with Zero! Pension...

[2] They STOP ALL my telephones & fax communications with ALL faculties,Departments and Persons in the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,Greece (from which I graduated with a B.Sc with Excellent degree) and they STOP my email communications with the Physics Dept. of McGill University,Canada(from which I graduated with a M.Sc with Canadian scholarship) and also STOP my communications with others organizations...

[3] NO Mass Media communication and journal publish my original fundamental scientific research...

[4] HUGE properties taxes ask from me the Greek Government,while it does NOT give my pension...

[5] NONE protection I have from the Greek Justice system, while many times I ask its help...

[6] HUGE Problems create to me the Petitions'Committee of European Parliament f.e as NOT registering many of my Petitions and Deleting Petitions of mine from its Internet submit site,etc,...

[7] I canNot receive a Vital book for my research, with title “Managing Nuclear projects” by J. Devgun
,2013 because it costs 175 Euro and Think that THE NUCLEAR HUMAN MANAGEMENT IS THE VITAL FACTOR IN NUCLEAR CATASTROPHES,etc ...

[8] Other additional Problems...

so how I can continue my Original Fundamental Scientific Research in International Nuclear Safety,Oncology and in other fields , for the big benefits of Humanity & planet Earth?...S.O.S....

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Aug 31, 2016 03:12 PM
+

SV1GZ Start a discussion...
To: European Parliament , Embassies of Nations , European Union Court of Justice , Others...
Κοιν. Πρός Εισαγγελείες Αθηνών, Γαλλική Πρεσβεία εν Ελλάδι, ως συνέχεια επικοινωνιών μου

From: Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear Fission(Applied + Theoretically),Mikras Asias 13,Agios Nikolaos,Anavissou,19013 Attiki,Greece,
tel+fax:+30-2291055275 , Sunday-5-May-2016

MY SCIENTIFIC CRITICISMS ON THE “NUCLEAR SAFETY DEBATE” IN EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT(ITRE)-12-Feb-2014,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFTIKFubyN8

A. From the Presenters of topics: 1. we consider most critical the contribution of the speaker on Nuclear Education & Training, because the Human Factor is the Primary reason in almost All Nuclear Accidents..., 2. The speaker of European Commission presented an intelligent talking, but it was narrow focused, as having in his mind mainly the Nuclear Technological factor, as the nuclear “stress” test..., 3. The representive of Nuclear Regulators demostrated a low intellectuality thinking and provided zero nuclear physics/nuclear fission & engineering professional information, which unfortunately may form a sample of the low quality qualifications in nuclear physics/nuclear fission/engineering of the Nuclear Regulators in ENSREG(European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group) and this it is a Problem!!! which may have HUGE Destructive Consequences for Europe & Worldwide...S.O.S...S.O.S...

B. From MEPs questioning in the Debate: 1. we consider more critical the questions of a Lady MEP who discuss the Influence of Government & Politicians & Others in jobs and decision process(es) of Nuclear Regulators and in Nuclear Systems, because it can effect directly the Nuclear Human Factor, which is the First cause in almost All Nuclear Accidents & Catastrophes..., 2. Also a Gentlement MEP with a family name from eastern European Nation presented interesting thiniking...

C. Concerning the whole Debate: We think is a scientific fact that it is impossible to have a Serious & Critical discussion on Nuclear Safety without to discuss its VITAL Nuclear Physics/Nuclear Fission/Engineering concepts as Nuclear Reactivity Transients, Loss of Coolant of Nuclear Fuel, Nuclear Human Factor & its Management , Unanticipated natural & technological events, etc. It is also critical need to motivate INDEPENDENT excellent Nuclear scientists/engineers to offer their comments & recomentations, without bias and daring to tell the scientific True! in their scientific criticisms & scientific communications...

D. From my personal experience, of my communications with scientific knowledge on nuclear physics/nuclear fission/engineering to International “atomic”(NUCLEAR!!!) Energy Agency[I.”A”.E.A.] & European Commission & Elsewhere, I never received a reply , except in very rare cases and even in these cases it was lacked of scientific Reasoning!!!...S.O.S...
       It is VITAL in Nuclear Safety ALL of its decisions to be based on high quality scientific REASONING!!! , because otherwise Nuclear Accidents & Catastrophes are facilitated...S.O.S...S.O.S..
Relevant is the scientific reference: “Theory of evolution of an Intelligent ecosystem” by Joseph-Christos Kondylakis, published in the scientific journal “Acta Biotheoretica”,June 1997, p.181-182
 

 

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jun 07, 2016 08:59 AM
Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Apr 04, 2016 04:03 PM
Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Apr 04, 2016 01:52 PM
+

SV1GZ To: PEOPLE,U.N.,I.C.C.'Prosecutor,Criminal Prosecutions,Embassies of Nations,Others,URGENT!!!
Σχετικό των Μηνύσεων+Επικοινωνιών μου πρός τις Εισαγγελείες Αθηνών+Αλλού...

THE PRACTICAL HIGH COMPLEXITY IN SOLVING THE VITAL!!! PROBLEM OF NUCLEAR
                                                          HUMAN FACTOR...

By Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear FISSION(Applied + Theoretically),Mikras Asias 13,Agios Nikolaos,Anavissou,19013 Attiki,Greece,
tel+fax:+30-22910-55275 , Saturday-12-March-2016

As we scientifically informed you in our previous communications:
1. A Nuclear Fission Reactor(s) Plant can under certain very critical conditions to explode as Nuclear Bomb!!..., in which case for a typical nuclear fission power plant of about >=1000 MWe ,we may expect about 20 Tones(20 000 000 000 000 micrograms)!! of Plutonium ,caming from the explosions of Nuclear Reactor cores and their used nuclear fuel storages (in wet or/and dry places in the area of nuclear plant), will go to world' stratosperic circulation and in waters and in the lands in inhalled sizes Plutonium particles, and Think one microgram of Plutonium can cause Cancer in a human...
2. Almost ALL!! Nuclear Accidents & Nuclear Catastrophes have as First!!! cause the Error(s) in Nuclear Human!!! Factor...
3. Internationally (f.e. in International “atomic”[NUCLEAR!!!] Energy Agency) & Nationally the Top Nuclear Safety decision makers are FULLY IGNORANCE of NUCLEAR PHYSICS/ NUCLEAR FISSION/NUCLEAR ENGINEERING and usually are f.e. Lawyers, Economists, Master of...Art(Painter?) graduates,Military,E.T.C. And we have f.e. a PROVEN FACT!!! that the Nuclear!!! Safety Advisor!! And Director!! of NUCLEAR!!! & Industrial SAFETY!! Agency of Japan was the...ECONOMIST!!! Nobuaki Terasaka ,who was Extremelly Unable in his performance concerning the Nuclear Catastrophe of Fukushima Nuclear Accident in Japan,2011 as very angry told the former Prime-Minister of Japan Mr. Kan...

Thinking on the above information, it very urgent to Question:
HOW IN URGENT WAYS AND IN SAFETY & SECURITY YOU CHANGE THESE UNQUALIFIED TO NUCLEAR PHYSICS /NUCLEAR FISSION/NUCLEAR ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT!!! & EMPLOYEES IN NUCLEAR SYSTEMS & NUCLEAR ORGANIZATIONS AND REPLACE THEM WITH VERY HIGH QUALIFIED(THEORETICALLY & APPLIED) NUCLEAR!!! HUMANS SPECIALISTS & ADVISORS?...
This problem is highly complex because these NON-Qualified persons have very strong “connections” to Top Politicians, secret societies as f.e. Masons (f.e the USA & CANADA Nuclear cities Los Angeles & Deep River have jewish controlled Masonic Lodges!,etc) and also have other “powerful” “connections”,E.T.C.,...AND by themselves they are unwilling to resign because of the high finance & power of their job(s)...
This author thought one solution to use the Criminal Prosecution(s) to Force them in Resignation & Court trial , but even in this solution the experience of this author is IF exist Independed Justice System, which in Urgent & Efficient way(s) to solve this Major Problem of Humanity & Planet Earth...
…..S.O.S....S.O.S...S.O.S..................S.O.S...S.O.S...S.O.S..................................S.O.S...S.O.S...S.O.S......

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Mar 14, 2016 10:00 AM
+

rozbrna Dear colleagues, The European Union Open Data Portal https://open-data.europa.eu/ received a request from the user's community to publish open data on the amount of wind and sunshine (and at what strength) in a particular area.

Our users would like to re-use this data in the context of upcoming affordable renewable energy solutions for private persons. Apparently the data is nationally available, but some governments, f.e Belgian, would charge them the fees for making the data available, while it should be publicly accessible.

Thank you for letting us know if you could help us to fulfill the request.

Rating
0
Last discussed by rozbrna
Mar 03, 2016 11:39 AM
 
Loading