– or –
Please login or register to participate.
.
 
+

SV1GZ THE ULTRA VITAL PETITION 0725/2020 TO EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ...

      ΠΕΡΙΛΗΨΗ ΤΗΣ ΕΞΑΙΡΕΤΙΚΑ ΖΩΤΙΚΟΤΑΤΗΣ ΣΗΜΑΣΙΑΣ ΑΝΑΦΟΡΑΣ
                                               0725/2020
ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟ ΕΥΡΩΠΑ’Ι’ΚΟ ΚΟΙΝΟΒΟΥΛΙΟ , ΠΟΥ ΑΦΟΡΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΑ’Ι’ΚΗ & ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΑ ΠΥΡΗΝΙΚΗ ΑΣΦΑΛΕΙΑ,Κ.Τ.Λ. ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΔΙΕΘΝΕΙΣ ΙΔΙΩΤΕΣ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΙΤΕΣ & ΤΗΝ ΝΕΑ ΤΑΞΗ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΩΝ,Κ.Τ.Λ.

          Από τον Ιωσήφ-Χρήστον Κ. Κονδυλάκη/Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,
    Πυρηνικός Φυσικός,κ.τ.λ.,Μικράς Ασίας 13,Αγιος Νικόλαος,Αναβύσσου,
19013 Αττική,Ελλάς,τηλ+φαξ +30-2291055275 , Δευτέρα-14-Σεπτεμβρίου-2020

Επειδή η Αναφορά μου 0725/2020 είναι Εξαιρετικά Ζωτικοτάτης!! σημασίας δια το Δημόσιον Συμφέρον και το Μέλλον της Ευρώπης,Ανθρωπότητος και του πλανήτη Γη , δια ταύτα δημοσιεύουμε σύντομη περίληψη της και ζηταμε την υψηλη ευαισθητοποίηση και ενεργοποίηση των πολιτών της Ευρώπης και της Ανθρωπότητος δια την λίαν ισχυρά υποστήριξη της με όλες τις κατάλληλες ενέργειες,κ.τ.λ.,...
                                     

          Το αρχικό αίτημα μου είναι να θεωρηθή ΥΨΙΣΤΗΣ πρωτεραιότητος η Αναφορά(Petition) μου με αρ. πρωτ. 0725/2020 , υπό την έννοια να γίνει παραδεκτή δια εξέταση της από τους Ευρωβουλευτές εις την επόμενη συνάντηση της Επιτροπής Αναφορών του Ευρωπα’ι’κού Κοινοβουλιού ΚΑΙ να χαρακτηριστή ως ΚΟΡΥΦΑΙΑΣ πρωτεραιότητος δια να συζητηθή στο Ευρωκοινοβούλιο εντός
του έτους 2020.

Τούτο δικαιολογήται λόγω των ΕΞΑΙΡΕΤΙΚΑ ΖΩΤΙΚΩΝ προβλημάτων της Ευρωπα’ι’κής & Παγκοσμίου ΠΥΡΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΑΣΦΑΛΕΙΑΣ, (ενδεικτικά η International “Atomic”(NUCLEAR!!) Energy Agency κατάφορα παραβιάζοντας τις Διεθνείς συνθήκες που την υποχρεώνουν!! να παίρνει “μέτρα” κατά των χειροτέρων!! δυνατών περιπτώσεων Πυρηνικής Καταστροφής ,από όσο γνωρίζω, πλήρως αγνοεί και δεν εξετάζει τις περιπτώσεις Εξαιρετικά Σοβαρών Πυρηνικών Ατυχημάτων όπου ενας πυρηνικός αντιδραστήρας ισχύος μπορεί να ανατιναχθεί ως Πυρηνική Βόμβα!! ,παρόλο που η λίαν πρωτοποριακή ερευνητική επιστημονική δημοσιευμένη (Proceeding of 19th Hellenic Nuclear Physics Society Symposium 2010 at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,Greece) έργασία μου με τίτλο “Theoretically and under very special contitions a nuclear fission reactor may explode as nuclear bomb” τους την κοινοποίησα και έγινε παγκοσμίως γνωστή το έτος 2010 και διότι εάν ανατιναχθεί ένα εργοστάσιο πυρηνικών αντιδραστήρων ισχύος ως πυρηνική βόμβα!! τότε υπολογίζεται πιθανώς να προκύψουν εκατοντάδες εκατομύρια νεκροί ,μακροπρόθεσμα... Επίσης το European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group εις τα Πυρηνικά “στρές” τεστ που κάνει ΔΕΝ μελετάει τον Ανθρωπινο παράγοντα που είναι η Πρωταρχική!! αιτία των Πυρηνικών Ατυχημάτων και Αλλα,Κ.Τ.Λ.)...

Επίσης η Αναφορά μου 0725/2020 αναφέρεται εις τα ΛΙΑΝ ΖΩΤΙΚΑ προβλήματα που προκαλεί το Σύστημα των ΔΙΕΘΝΩΝ ΙΔΙΩΤΩΝ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΙΤΩΝ(οι μεγαλήτεροι διεθνείς Τραπεζίτες γράφεται/λέγεται ότι είναι όλοι Εβραίοι) & ΣΥΝΕΡΓΑΤΩΝ τους(η λεγόμενη cabal/kabbalah τους),Κ.Τ.Λ. (ενδεικτικά προβλήματα που δημιουργούν είναι πιθανότατα Παγκόσμιους Πολέμους, Οικονομικές Κρίσεις,Διαλύσεις Οικογενειών & Διαπροσωπικών σχέσεων,Χάσιμο σπιτιών & εργασιών, ψυχολογικές/ ψυχιατρικές ασθένειες,ηλιθιοποίηση[Πόλεμος Καταστροφής της Νοημοσύνης] και υποβιβασμός εξαθλοίωση των Ανθρώπων σε επίπεδο κατώτερο των ζώων,κ.α.,κ.τ.λ). Επιπλέον εις την κατηγορία αυτή γίνεται ΠΟΛΕΜΟΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΡΟΦΗ ΤΗΣ (Διανοητικής) ΝΟΗΜΟΣΥΝΗΣ, βάζουν τεράστιους φραγμούς εις την Θεμελειώδη Θεωρητική επιστημονική έρευνα της Ογκολογίας,προωθούν την “Νεα Τάξη Πραγμάτων” και υπαρχουν ισχυρές ενδείξεις και υποψίες για Very Important Persons(VIPs) και Διεθνείς Τραπεζίτες να εμπλέκονται πιθανώς με τον Σατανισμό ,παιδεραστία και Ανθρωποθυσίες στον Σατανά χρησιμοποιόντας τελετουργίες της Εβρα’ι’κής θρησκείας καμπαλά,Κ.Τ.Λ.

Επιπροσθέτως , θεωρώ ΑΠΟΛΥΤΩΣ ΑΠΑΡΑΙΤΗΤΟ!!! δια την καλή κατανόηση της Αναφοράς μου ,να παρακολουθήσετε ΟΛΑ τα σχετικά βίντεο σε : DVDs,Internet sites που γράφω μέσα στην Αναφορά μου και στα ηλεκτρονικά ταχυδρομεία που έστειλα μετά την ταχυδρομική υποβολή της Αναφοράς μου 0725/2020 ,Κ.Α.,Κ.Τ.Λ.

Rating
0
Last created by SV1GZ
Sep 15, 2020 11:47 PM
+

TheSaviorMessiah Global Warming, Planet Temperature Rising Is Like Road Traffic Congestion

Source: https://theworld.data.blog/2020/01/20/global-warming-planet-temperature-rising-is-like-road-traffic-congestion/

That is the most simplify, easiest example & comparison with global warming or temperature rising of planet Earth.

What you are seeing on the media about Global Warming, Climate Change is not the full picture of what happening on Earth, but just a tiny one.

What happen when traffic congestion happen on the street?

More car, motorbike. And the total temperature on the street at that time is always higher than the temperature when is not have the congestion. Why? Because the total fuel using when the congestion is higher, simple as that.

In order for you to fully understand the big problem why global warming is happening, then you just need to study the subject road traffic congestion and use your brain to link to the environment problem.

The road traffic congestion happen because of 2 reasons:

– One is because of too much vehicles like car, motorbikes, etc.

– Two is because the road to small, to little space for the vehicles running.

That is the main problems, but you can say car could run too small, or the road is bad but in the end what you should care the most is above two reasons.

When you link to global warming subject, it pretty much the same:

– The first is relate to CO2 subject, but not because of too much CO2 like the media are talking but the reverse, too little CO2.

– The second reason I will keep at secret, you must find out by yourself. I am not allowed to tell it for free here. You if you have will you will easily finding out.

The media are talking bullshit just too get attention or for whatever reason only they known.

If too much CO2 is the problem, then why after the volcano Tambora eruption in 1815 the temperature was decrease significant, remember there was a lot of CO2 and stronger than CO2 chemical came out after that.

There is no doubt that temperature raising will lead to ice melting, thus sea level rising.

But not only that, it is also trigger many volcano eruption soon for they like nuclear plant.

You can do your own research about what happened about Tambora volcano eruption, then mutiply 10 times bigger, then you will you have the answer. But that just the estimate, you cannot know what is real unless you face that in real life.

I do not want to scare anybody, but the Bible revelation already predicted at least 1/3 of humans will die once that event happen.

But that just the Bible predicted, the final outcome could be worse or better than that is depend on humanity.

As a completed qualified gamer of this Earth game, I can say it is easy to reserve it but the time is limited. If the Bible said the event would come at around 03/03/2021, then humanity must act before that at least 1 year, which is must before 03/03/2020. Otherwise, there is no more chance.

Here is no act in wrong direction like what happening, but must the right direction with nature & universe language.

I am happy to show you the way, show you the right direction, but I am not allowed to give it for free. What I was asking is just little worthless cryptocurrency backed by air, not gold crystal, not control over people of any nation or whatever other object.

Many masters, gurus who have lived over 200 years old on this planet even compare this to a prison planet. But "no pain no gain", but too much pain could lead to the end.

But what is the perfect enough fire?

I am the one who have the perfect answer for that.

You must open your eyes, do not become the antichrist who are refusing to verify to talk to admit their mistake and change to the right direction. At the end of the day, there are only 2 results: Go With God or Vanished For Go Against God. There is no any other result than that.

Best Regard,
The Savior Messiah Mahdi Maitreya Anyname

Rating
0
Last discussed by mtboan
Sep 15, 2020 08:30 AM
Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Sep 03, 2020 02:06 PM
+

anicol Topic : Does the plastic pollution of the seas come from the rivers ?
Is the Mediterraean sea polluted ? (see
https://www.wwf.fr/mediterranee-pollution-plastique ). According to my readings, this pollution comes from the rivers and it seems logic to look for the sources of such a pollution and for the solutions. In Netherland, an ecological organization has built a barge to collect plastic in a rivers.
 What about collecting wastes from a barge in the rivers (at the least in their estuary) before being in the seas or the oceans ? (is it possible ? for the most polluted rivers ?)
I can imagine that the European Countries are not the only ones to be responsible of the pollution of the mediterranean sea...

Rating
0
Last discussed by liza788
Aug 30, 2020 07:28 PM
+

Drohh Hello
my name is Tomas

I study mechanical engineering and I am very interested in ecology.  For that i have a question I would like to ask you. 

On website of EEA
https://www.eea.europa.eu/d[…]by-transport-6#tab-chart_3, there is a chart of final energy consumption by traffic mode. I am interested, what does that mean for road trasport. Is it only energy that is directly transformed to kinetic energy of road vehicles or is lost energy, such as through friction and thermal ineffeciency of heat engine etc. included in said value?

If this is not question for you,perhaps you could point me to the right person. I am considering this topic for my bachelor thesis, so this would greatly help me.

Thank you for your time 

Sincerely

Tomas

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Aug 26, 2020 03:59 PM
+

sosorior I think there is something wrong with the data regarding free- allocation in the ETS Data Viewer https://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/emissions-trading-viewer-1 . The volume of 1.1 Freely allocated allowances is just so high. It cannot be that free allocation alone is higher than verified emissions. It does not make sense. Furthermore, this number does not match the sum of 1.1.3 Free allocation for modernisation of electricity generation (Art. 10c), 1.1.2 Free allocation from the new entrants reserve (Art. 10a(7)), 1.1.1 Free allocation to existing entities (Art. 10a(1)). The number reported as the aggregate is indeed twice the sum of its components. I could not find any other place to report this inconsistency.

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Aug 26, 2020 03:39 PM
+

MerleGering Where is the correct location to measure NO2 to determine whether or not the EU NO2 annual mean limit is being met?

I wish to understand the correct location, for monitoring NO2. Tech Report 11 suggests that kerbside is an appropriate location. In the UK, The Department for Environment (DEFRA), has moved the correct location further away from the road, to the building facade, (see box 1.1 of their LAQM Technical Guidance16 'TG16') - which will of course record much lower readings. Is this the right place to be monitoring, for correct implementation of the Air Quality Monitoring Directive and for assessing whether or not the annual mean NO2 limit is being breached?

the Directive , in Annex VI, instructs national authorities to monitor at points "where highest concentration occur" to which "the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed".
In my view, that means you should locate monitors (in this case diffusion tubes) at kerbside (since the directive explicitly excludes measurement in the road. that's where the highest concentrations will occur, and large numbers of people will be exposed at those levels (for example in the UK, there are 1.2 million professional drivers, who will at least get this exposure 8 hours a day, 5 days a week; then there are postmen, street cleaners, builders & engineers working in the roads works, waiters serving in streetside cafes, trash collectors, etc)

 I am a citizen scientist and campaigner in the UK. I am concerned that the true extent of the problem is being concealed by measuring NO2 in locations which artificially reduce the reported levels.

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Aug 26, 2020 03:13 PM
+

AWolf total CO2 emissions EU27 2018?
data base:
https://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/greenhouse-gases-viewer
CO2 EU27 2018:
Total (without LULUCF, with international transport): 3.321 million tonnes
4 - Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry: -282 million tonnes
own calculation> Total (with LULUCF, with international transport) resp. total CO2 emissions EU27: 3.039 million tonnes?

Two questions about this:
(1) Is the calculation of the total CO2 emissions for the EU27 in 2018 correct (see above; 3.039 million tonnes)?
(2) Is there a measure of the trustworthiness of this number for the negative LULUCF emissions? E.g. Ranges of uncertainty?

Thank you in advance for the information.

Rating
+1
Last discussed by AWolf
Aug 26, 2020 02:29 PM
 
Loading