– or –
Please login or register to participate.
.
 
+

seruet Hello,
I tried to work with the LCP-Database (
https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/lcp-8) and I think the data for Germany in 2017 is not correct, as the MWth numbers and other fields differ very much from the prior years. Did anybody else notice this issue or is there an explanation for this?

Kind regards from Germany!

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Aug 13, 2019 09:40 AM
+

Moon Hi, I am searching for the average CO2 emission by large manufacturers in Europe (https://www.eea.europa.eu/d[…]-manufacturer-5#tab-chart_2). It seems like EEA does not provide 2018 figures yet...so I found a raw data which turned out to have around 15mn rows and, thus, cannot be analyzed using Excel.

When does EEA plan to provide average CO2 emission by large manufacturers in 2018? Or is there a way for me to know this information?

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 30, 2019 02:54 PM
+

ant Dear all,

I have some questions regarding the consistency of the data published in CO2_passengers_cars_v17_csv.zip (Monitoring of CO2 emissions from passenger cars,
https://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/co2-cars-emission-16).
I know the data is marked as "provisional", but nonetheless I'd like to do some analysis with it. I apologize if there is any better place to ask these questions and I’d be thankful for any relating hints.

1) Several entries of the field Mh (Manufacturer name EU standard denomination) contain the word "Duplicate". Does this mean that the corresponding data row should be omitted in the analysis (e.g. when calculating average CO2 emissions)? If so, why are they published?
For example, see data row 6747 (ID 14555502). All entries are identical to the preceding row except for the fields Mh, Mp, VFN, Ewltp and Vf.

2) As in the previous example, emission data originating from apparently identical vehicle types may differ significantly. For example, the data in row 1749 and 1750 (ID 14560585/6) only differ in the NEDC and WLTP emission figures, i.e. 149 vs 160g/km and 173 vs 184g/km, respectively. What may cause this discrepancy?

Rating
0
Last discussed by ant
Jul 19, 2019 03:09 PM
 
Loading