Please note that this forum is no longer in use and has been replaced by an online contact us form.

Be assured that the information service rendered by the EEA remains similar. Note that the content of this forum will remain publicly available until the end of 2020. After that we will archive it for internal use for a max retention period of 3 years. Any personal data will be deleted after this retention period.

With kind regards,
EEA Enquiry Service

Please login to participate.
MalteG Sep 02, 2018 12:44 PM
Dear EAA Team

I am working on a research project on the environmental impact of mining in Europe. I therefore used the PRTR register to find the pollutant emissions from the NACE section B (Mining and Quarrying).

Now I notice a relatively strong discrepancy between the PRTR data and the data provided by eurostat ( Using the example of NOX emissions in 2015, according to PRTR (ReportingYear 2015; Excluding Norway, Switzerland, Serbia and Iceland, NACE activities 05.10 - 09.90), there has been an output of 53,544 tons of NOX. According to the eurostat database (same countries, NACE section "Mining and quarrying") the output was 122,821 tons of NOX.
These deviations seem to occur for other pollutant parameters as well.

Now the question to the experts: Why do the data deviate by the relatively large factor of more than 2? Is this discrepancy known? And finally, which datasource is more reliable in terms of the possibility to relate pollutant outputs to certain industrial sectors and shall be used by scientists/decision makers etc.?

Looking forward to your reply. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards
Replies (5)
EEA Sep 07, 2018 01:41 PM
We hereby acknowledge receipt of your question. Our capacity to answer enquiries is limited for the moment. We will come back to you as soon as possible. We apologise for any inconvenience.

Best regards
EEA Sep 10, 2018 09:19 AM
E-PRTR reporters/operators are using first and foremost the activities outlined in the E-PRTR Regulation Annex for reporting their own main activity. NACE codes are therefore often not reported correctly or they are tied to the economic classification of the facilities in question. You could filter for E-PRTR activity codes 3.(a) (underground mining) or 3.(b) (opencast mining) instead of the NACE codes reported. You also might want to check out the Annex of the Regulation above as well to get a better idea of it all.

Should you have any follow-up questions, our colleague dealing with this topic has agreed to provide his contact:

Best regards
MalteG Sep 11, 2018 12:09 PM
Thanks for your notice. I am looking forward to your answer.

Best regards
MalteG Sep 11, 2018 12:11 PM
I have just seen your final answer. Thank you very much, also for providing the contact to your colleague!

Best regards
lockdown99 Mar 14, 2020 03:19 AM
Thank you for this notice. I have seen some perfume info of Europe on