– or –
Please login or register to participate.
.
 
+

SV1GZ THE PEOPLE RIGHTS TO KNOW ABOUT NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE THREATS ...

By Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear Fission(Applied+
       Theoretically),Mikras Asias 13,Agios Nikolaos,Anavissou,19013 Attiki,Greece,
                      tel+fax:+30-2291055275, Friday-21-September-2018

Your relevant references are:
[1] “Rights to know and the Fukushima,Chernobyl and Three Miles Island (Nuclear) Accidents” by Kristin-Shrader-Frechette, in book “The Ethics of Nuclear Energy” edited by Behnam Taebi,et al,2015
[2] My Petition to European Parliament/ENVI+ITRE Committees of Friday-14-September-2018
[3] My relevant previous communications...
[4] My fax & email entitled “ON SEVERE & EXTREME SEVERE NUCLEAR CRISIS PREVENTION :THE SIMILARITY OF STATUS OF NUCLEAR ORGANIZATIONS AND RELATED POLITICAL ORGANS WITH THE STATUS OF THE DISASTER OF N.A.S.A. COLUMBIA ACCIDENT...” , dated Wednesday-19-September-2018
[5] My law action to the Prosecution of Supreme Criminal Court of Greece file no 8081/5-Nov-1998 ,and my law action to the Prosecution of the first instance Criminal Court in Athens Greece file no IB2010/6120 ,and my file no 8800/5-July-2017 in the Greek Atomic Energy Commission...

   Virtually all democratic nations,international organizations and labor and consumer groups affirm the public's right to know any information (about what) could cause serious harm...Yet,official government,industry,and UN International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA)...have misrepresented information about the severity and consequences of (the major nuclear) accidents. As a result,they have violated citizens'right to know and therefore likely increased the death and injury rates associated with these (Nuclear) Accidents[1]...
   It is the people right to know about the worst nuclear Catastrophes ,and more specifically about the Huge Consequences of a future Extreme Severe Nuclear Catastrophe(due to lack of nuclear safety or/and security) in which case perhaps the dead people may be counted in hundreds of millions and the economical cost may be of the order of perhaps more than 150 Trillions of Euro [2],[3]...
Because the Prevention is Everything!! for the above Case, which may occur as an alternative evolution option in f.e. a serious nuclear fuel melting (“nuclear meltdown”) in a nuclear power plant or in a serious nuclear security event and because of the very vulnerable human factor in nuclear organizations and political organizations & elsewhere, considering that :
THE HUMAN FACTOR,in widest meaning,IS A FIRST CAUSE OF NUCLEAR CATASTROPHES
a) Very often critical nuclear safety & security information are blocked in administrations(f.e. [4])
b) Very serious illegal actions & experiments to critical nuclear workers may happen in secret (f.e. [5])
c) Very often Political organizations(f.e. Parliaments) interest Only for their local voters typical issues,
and are usually unable to understand complex technical themes, for instance politicians and mass media communications may be more interested for f.e. a baby dropping from an airplane ,than for a vital nuclear safety Prevention study for a low probability but of Huge! Catastrophe Nuclear accident...
d) Special-interest science is performed or funded by industries,special interests,who seek private profits,not public goods like health or unbiased knowledge.They fund scientists to give them what they want ,including incomplete,biased “science” affirming that the funders' product are safe or beneficial[1]
e) Lobbies and connections and money perhaps effect everything in Parliament(s) & Government(s)...
    Because of the above,we Inform THE PEOPLE and their Organizations & Media for potential future
    HUGE Nuclear Catastrophe(s) and we ask to Fully Investigate our References & Act Preventively!...

Rating
0
Last created by SV1GZ
Sep 23, 2018 07:25 PM
+

gongarda Dear EEA Web Team,
I am a heavy user of the Natura 2000 Viewer (link below) and it seems to be offline (see error below, displayed when I access the link)

http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/


Technical Information (for support personnel)

Error Code: 500 Internal Server Error. The parameter is incorrect. (87)

Could you help me access the viewer?

Thanks,
David Gonzalez

Rating
0
Last discussed by Johnywalter
Sep 17, 2018 11:40 AM
+

MalteG Dear EAA Team

I am working on a research project on the environmental impact of mining in Europe. I therefore used the PRTR register to find the pollutant emissions from the NACE section B (Mining and Quarrying).

Now I notice a relatively strong discrepancy between the PRTR data and the data provided by eurostat (
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/de/data/database). Using the example of NOX emissions in 2015, according to PRTR (ReportingYear 2015; Excluding Norway, Switzerland, Serbia and Iceland, NACE activities 05.10 - 09.90), there has been an output of 53,544 tons of NOX. According to the eurostat database (same countries, NACE section "Mining and quarrying") the output was 122,821 tons of NOX.
These deviations seem to occur for other pollutant parameters as well.

Now the question to the experts: Why do the data deviate by the relatively large factor of more than 2? Is this discrepancy known? And finally, which datasource is more reliable in terms of the possibility to relate pollutant outputs to certain industrial sectors and shall be used by scientists/decision makers etc.?

Looking forward to your reply. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards
Malte

Rating
+1
Last discussed by MalteG
Sep 11, 2018 01:11 PM
Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Aug 30, 2018 03:01 PM
+

SV1GZ PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IS TRIGGERED FOR EXTREME SEVERE NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS / CATASTROPHES ...

  In Significant World High Priority...
       To: People,U.N.,European Union Institutions,Embassies of Nations,Media,Others...

THE TRIGGERING CONDITIONS OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE ARE ACTIVATED
          FOR THE EXTREME SEVERE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT(S)/CATASTROPHE(S)...

By Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear Fission,Mikras Asias 13,
Agios Nikolaos,Anavissou,19013 Attiki,Greece,tel+fax:+30-2291055275,Tuesday-14-August-2018

                                             Your relevant references are the following:
[1] My scientific article “Theoretically and under very special applied conditions a Nuclear fission reactor may explode as Nuclear Bomb”,published in the proceedings of 19th scientific symposium of the Hellenic Nuclear Physics Society,held at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,Greece on May 2010,also exist in Internet site:
http://inspirehep.net/record/1441083/files/Fulltext.pdf
{In an Extreme Severe Nuclear Accident ,a Nuclear Power Plant explode as Nuclear Bomb! ,f.e. if a typical Nuclear Fission Reactors Power Plant of 4x1000 MWe with its storage places of its used nuclear fuel explode as Nuclear Bomb , then about 20 Tones of plutonium(Pu) will be released to global environment stratosherically & troposherically and THINK that about 0.000001 gram Pu can cause Cancer!...Very approximately the Consequences in this case may be hundreds millions of dead(in long time) and the economical cost about or more that 150 Trillions Euro...}
[2] My fax & email entitled “ON A VERY INITIAL CONSIDERATION OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE FOR EXTREMELY SEVERE NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE(S) AND FOR BIG CATASTROPHES THAT MAY ARISE FROM THE BLOCKING OF PARTICULAR FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN FIELDS AS IN ONCOLOGY AND IN OTHER VITAL FIELDS OF SCIENCES...” , dated Thursday-9-August-2018
[3] The excellent report of UNESCO/COMEST entitled “The Precautionary Principle”,March 2005
[4] My relevant communications to my previous reference [1]

Considering,from [3],the Box 2-the Precautionary Principle,a working definition: When human activities may lead to morally unacceptable harm that is scientifically plausible,but uncertain,actions shall be taken to avoid or diminish that harm. We relevantly note that in the case of Extreme Severe Nuclear Accident the morally unacceptable harm refer to harm to humans and ecosystem that:
-Threatening to human life and health...And
-Be Serious and effectively irreversible(Death,e.t.c) And
-Inequitable to present and future generations And
-Imposed without adequate consideration of the human rights of those affected
The judgement of plausibility of harm is grounded in scientific analysis[1]
Uncertainty may apply to,but need not to be limited to,causality and the bounds of possible harm
Because the above conditions are fulfilled in our case the Precautionary Principle is triggered...

The thinking & actions that must be taken next are described in [3] and because of [1] we are available for contributions in our Theme, which our Theme must be considered in significant high priority in National,European & United Nations “levels” ,and we consider useful (because of [1],[4]) for our Theme to receive feedback communications...

 Dear Sir(s)+Madam(s)

The Existential Risk of Humanity(and of European People) we think must be The Top Priority Theme for People of planet Earth and of the European Parliament(s)...If a typical Nuclear Fission Reactors Power Plant explode as Nuclear Bomb! (a possible option in a Nuclear Plant “meltdown”) f.e. in France ,this Existential Risk may in considerable degree be realized...The Biggest problem in our case is the Human factor in the Nuclear Organizations and in Political jobs , because in the second case almost all Politicians live on the very busy day to day “business”(often of trivial matters) and they ignore medium & long time terms Top Priority Theme(s) of Europe and Humanity and so they do Not take relevant efficient & effective actions PRO-ACTIVELY & IN PREVENTION OF ULTRA HIGH CATASTROPHE(S)...In the following I send you my Ultra Critical article for your Serious Thinking and in High Priority actions(Please Study also its References and the References of References)...

S.N. Because of Great Violation(s) of European Treaty(ies) the Petition Committee of European
Parliament ILLEGALY is Not registering my Petitions for...years ,perhaps because of...”Higher” NOT European Interests,therefore I submit our Ultra Critical Theme directly to ALL MEPs and we hope also to receive meaningful feedback communication(s)...

From: Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist,Monday-20-August-2018

     To: People,U.N.,I.C.C.,European Union Institutions,Embassies of Nations,Media,Others...
From: Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear Fission(Applied +
         Theoretically),Mikras Asias 13,Agios Nikolaos,Anavissou,19013 Attiki,Greece,
          tel+fax:+30-2291055275,email: sifiskon@otenet.gr, Saturday-18-August-2018

    EXISTENTIAL RISK NEGLIGENCE AS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

... For example, it could in theory be made a crime against humanity
 to recklessly and negligently take action (or no action for Prevention) which creates a significant risk of extinction for humanity...
     Taken from the Global Priorities Project 2017 “Existential Risks: Diplomacy & Governance” by Sebastian Farquhar,John Halstead,Owen Cotton-Barratt,Stefan Schubert,Haydn Belfield,Andrew Snyder-Beattie
                       ITS SUBCASE OF EXTREME SEVERE NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE...
                                             Your references are the following:
[1] Fax & email “THE TRIGGERING CONDITIONS OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE ARE ACTIVATED FOR THE EXTREME SEVERE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT(S) / CATASTROPHE(S)...” by Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Tuesday-14-August-2018
[2] Scientific article “Theoretically and under very special applied conditions a Nuclear fission reactor may explode as Nuclear Bomb”,by Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,published in the proceedings of 19th scientific symposium of the Hellenic Nuclear Physics Society,held at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,Greece on May 2010,also exist in Internet site: http://inspirehep.net/record/1441083/files/Fulltext.pdf
{In an Extreme Severe Nuclear Accident ,a Nuclear Power Plant explode as Nuclear Bomb! ,f.e. if a typical Nuclear Fission Reactors Power Plant of 4x1000 MWe with its storage places of its used nuclear fuel explode as Nuclear Bomb , then about 20 Tones of plutonium(Pu) will be released to global environment stratosherically & troposherically and THINK that about 0.000001 gram Pu can cause Cancer!...Very approximately the Consequences in this case may be hundreds millions of dead(in long time) and the economical cost about or more that 150 Trillions Euro...}

   The Responsibility to the Existence of present & future generations of Humanity & planet Earth must be considered the Top Responsibility of Humanity & the Highest Duty of Governments in planet Earth.
   It is from our experience that often the top management in National,European & International Organizations (public & private) they do not respond to their duty mentioned in the previous paragraph, because probably the top management & its “advisors” are unable to understand complex ultra critical technical themes or/and because reject fully independent! scientific research (accepting only “invited” research which very often may be controlled research) or/and perhaps because they do not want to go against ultra high economic interests of the order of billions to trillions of euro...even if this inaction(s) may be considered as a type of considerable existential risk for the Humanity & planet Earth ecosystem(s) large number of species...In such cases and related cases the EXISTENTIAL RISK NEGLIGENCE AS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY
 become a real possibility...

P.S. Even in non-existential risk for the Humanity, but for Risks that may effect Millions to Billions of Humans,as f.e in Oncology Fundamental Scientific Research,e.t.c.(references existing into [1]) we can consider again type(s) of Crime Against Humanity under the thinking of our Theme...

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Aug 27, 2018 03:33 PM
 
Loading