– or –
Please login or register to participate.
.
 
+

michaelphilipp Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren!

Durch Klimaschutz und die Umstellung unseres Energiesystems auf erneuerbare Energien geht Österreich einen großen Schritt in Richtung Energieautarkie und sorgt gleichzeitig für nachhaltiges Wirtschaftswachstum durch green jobs.

So geht es weltweit darum, dass wir Menschen glauben, den Klimawandel steuern können.
Angeblich lässt sich das durch Verminderung des CO2-Ausstoßes, den die Menschheit verursacht hat, bewerkstelligen.
Unbestritten ist für mich, dass sich die Erdatmosphäre erwärmt.
Für mich stellt sich die Frage, wie hoch ist der Erderwärmungs-Anteil, den die Menschheit verursacht?
Bis heute habe ich von keinem der 8 angeschriebenen deutschsprachigen Umweltinstitute eine plausible physikalische Erklärung hinsichtlich der CO2-Problematik erhalten.
Deshalb wende ich mich an Sie.
Alle Institute berufen sich auf irgendwelche wissenschaftliche Gutachten, die sehr abstrakt und umstritten sind.
Auch kein Wissenschaftler liefert den wissenschaftlichen Beweis – d.h. jeder Zeit sollte das Ergebnis eindeutig und reproduzierbar sein -, dass der Mensch mit seinen 4 zusätzlich erzeugten CO2-Molekülen von 100.000 Molekülen in der Luft die Katastrophe der Erderwärmung ausgelöst hat.
Die Vermutungen dazu sind sehr vage und sehr zahlreich.
Allein die Natur liefert mehr als den 10-fachen CO2-Anteil als den der Menschen. Von der Wissenschaft wird uns empfohlen, mit unserem 6%-CO2-Anteil die Welt vor ihrer steigenden Erwärmung zu retten.
In der Erdgeschichte gab es ohne der Menschen bei wesentlich höheren CO2-Konzentrationen keine Erderwärmung und umgekehrt.
Im 13. Jahrhundert war die Erderwärmung un 2 Grad höher ohne Industriezeitalter!

Zum Thema Klimawandel durch CO2 habe ich einige Fragen, Der momentane Anstieg der mittleren Erdtemperatur ist sicherlich unbestritten. Die Ursachen für die Klimaerwärmung sind mannigfaltig (insbesondere durch pulsierende Sonnenaktivitäten, Vulkanausbrüche auf Land oder in Meerestiefen, Rodung und Brandrodung der Wälder, ( dadurch Verlust von Schatten- und Wolkenbildung), angeblich aber auch durch zunehmenden CO2-Ausstoß von Natur und Menschen etc..
Angeregt durch die aktuellen internationalen Klima-Diskussionen auf Konferenzen und durch die Medien, mit den Aufforderungen der Experten an die Menschen die Reduzierung von CO2, da diese angeblich die Hauptursache für die Klimaerwärmung ist, habe ich mir die offizielle Zusammensetzung der Luft angeschaut
(siehe:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luft).
Als Luft bezeichnet man das Gasgemisch der Erdatmosphäre. Trockene Luft besteht hauptsächlich aus den zwei Gasen Stickstoff (rund 78,08 Vol.-%) und Sauerstoff (rund 20,95 Vol.-%). Daneben gibt es noch die Komponenten Argon (0,93 Vol.-%), Kohlenstoffdioxid (0,04 Vol.-%) und andere Gase in Spuren.
Das ergibt 99,96% ohne den CO2-Anteil.
Wie kann ich mir schlüssig und auf einfache Weise erklären, dass ein verschwindend kleiner Anteil von CO2-Molekülen mit nur ca. 0,04% Volumenanteil in der Luft maßgeblich an der viel diskutierten Erderwärmung verantwortlich ist ?
Um sich die Größenordnung bildlich vorzustellen, würde das folgendes bedeuten, dass von ca. 100.000 Molekülen in der Luft nur ca. 40 Moleküle aus CO2 bestehen.
Und von diesen 40 (vierzig) CO2-Molekülen trägt der Mensch maximal 6-10 % bei.
Das bedeutet wiederum, dass von den 100.000 Molekülen in der Luft nur 4 (vier) CO2-Moleküle durch den Menschen erzeugt wurden.
Demnach beträgt der Anteil von Menschen erzeugte CO2-Molekülen maximal ca. 0,004% Volumenanteile. Die anderen 90-94% CO2-Moleküle erzeugt die Natur, auf die wir ohnehin keinen Einfluss haben!
Wir wollen mit unserem von Menschen erzeugten CO2-Anteil von 0,004% auf das Klima einwirken, oder sogar die Welt retten?
Mir scheint diese Zielsetzung sehr ambitioniert, rührend, sehr überheblich und auch ein wenig arrogant, wenn man die prozentualen Verhältnisse betrachtet von Mensch zur Natur).

Meine Kernfrage an Sie lautet:
Welches physikalische oder thermodynamische Gesetz bewirkt, dass die 4 (vier) vom Menschen erzeugten CO2-Moleküle auch den Rest
- es sind im Verhältnis ca. 100.000 Moleküle in der Luft – maßgeblich erwärmen und dadurch die Erderwärmung in die Höhe treibt ?
Dazu ein anschauliches Beispiel zum Größenvergleich:
Man nehme einen Hebelarm mit einer Länge von 100 Metern.
Die Länge beträgt demnach 100.000 mm.
Auf jeden Millimeter befindet sich ein Luftmolekül.
Die letzten 40 Millimeter sind die CO2-Moleküle.
Die allerletzten 4 Moleküle sind die von Menschen erzeugten Moleküle.
Die Wissenschaftler behauptet nun - um bei dem Beispiel zu bleiben -, dass durch Verlängern oder verkürzen des Hebelarmes von 4 mm die Temperatur auf unserer Erde zu steuern ist.
Dazu habe ich an Sie eine Grundsatzfrage.

Gegenfrage:
Kann es sein, wenn es im Extremfall keine Menschen gäbe, dass durch die 4 (vier) fehlenden CO2-Moleküle von 100.000 Molekülen die mittlere Erdtemperatur wieder sinkt oder im natürlichen Bereich konstant bleibt?
Bis heute fehlt bei der Betrachtung der Erdgeschichte der wissenschaftliche Beweis, dass bei jeder vorlaufende CO2-Erhöhung stets auch eine Temperaturerhöhung der Atmosphäre nach sich zieht.
Die physikalische Erklärung sollte möglichst auf einfache Weise verständlich sein, damit sie der auch der Laie versteht.

Zusammenfassend:
8 (Acht) Umweltinstitute habe ich um eine plausible Antwort gebeten.
Welches physikalische oder thermodynamische Gesetz bewirkt,
dass bei 100.000 Molekülen in der Luft
die 4 (vier) vom Menschen erzeugten CO2-Moleküle
maßgeblich die Erderwärmung in die Höhe treibt?
Alle haben sich auf irgendwelche wissenschaftliche Gutachten bezogen.

Ein Beispiel als Antwort/Auszug vom Umweltbundesamt Dessau wortwörtlich:
„…. dass auch Substanzen in geringen Konzentrationen eine große Wirkung haben können,
wie u.a. am Beispiel starker Schlangengifte deutlich wird.“

Über eine Antwort würde ich mich freuen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Dipl. Ing. Michael Philipp
Kirchhamerstr. 26
A-5751 Maishofen
Tel./Fax: +43/ (0)6542/68402
e-mail: landhaus-saalachau@sbg.at

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Oct 29, 2018 04:21 PM
+

MdI The PROBLEM of Acrolein and Formaldehyde Analysis from Stationary Source in Italy.
In Italy use EPA TO-11A 1999 for Industry Emission Stationary Source, not only for Formaldehyde (Instead of e.g. EPA M 0011 ) but also for Acroleine (Instead of e.g. NCASI 99.02). It is an absurd scientific and technicaly that could hide acroelin emission from some industry, like ceramic industry, due to the combustion of thousands of tons / year polyacrylates (used as slurry fluids), glycerol, vegetable oils and other polymers used as screen printing vehicles, as well as to underestimate formaldehyde due to the same use of glycols, polyglycols, etc. ..

All in ovens that have known problems of incomplete combustion due to the countercurrent supply of the tiles, which bring a large part of the organic substances to decompose between 250-450 °C before arriving in the part of the furnace where they would arrive between 800-1200 ° C for complete combustion.

In detail:
 
The PROBLEM of Acrolein and Formaldehyde Analysis from Stationary Source in Italy. The Emilia Romagna Region,(but it is not the only one in Italy...) with DGR 2236/2009 attachment 3 B indicates as methods suitable for the analysis of aldehydes and formaldehyde at emissions the following two methods:
 
EPA TO-11A of 1999 and the NIOSH 2016. Both methods for ambient air with DNPH derivative in silica cartridge. They are obviously ambient air methods and therefore off-field application among other things with derivatization method that is notoriously inadequate to the acrolein analysis and sampling flows below 2 l / min. A ceramic industry kiln emission , in example that is the mayor local kind of industry, have a flow rate between 20 and 30 thousand m3 / h corresponding to flows of about 400/500000 liters per minute.
 
EPA TO-11A has suffered an addendum in 2000 that specifies that this method not to be applicable acrolein and in the list of necessary updates of the EPA March 2018 is specified not to be adequate to the acrolein analysis:
 
https://www3.epa.gov/[…]/toxcompd.pdf
 
The NIOSH 2016 always indicated by the Region for generic analysis aldehydes is actually a room air derivatization for formaldehyde very similar to EPA to-11A. The analogous NIOSH 2018, which would be the apllicable in ambient air for generic aldehydes, also reports on page 5 the NON applicability to unsaturated aldehydes (with a 30% lower recovery). In addition, we always talk about ambient air methods and if we consider the indications in points 4.1.6.4.9.27. 10.3 of the same EPA TO-11 A it is clear that the conditions of applicability of the same not only for acrolein, but for aldehydes in general a Stationary Stack are incompatible with the typical ones authorized for a ceramic kiln indicated here (and provided for by Legislative Decree 1159/2014 Emilia Romagna):
 
https://www.arpae.it/dettag[…]?id=2421&idlivello=1487
 
 
Among other things, we mention that this method the EPA Methods for Emissions Flows conveyed for formaldehyde / aldehydes are others and indicated here:
 
https://www.epa.gov/[…]/final-rule-methods-innovation-rule-mir
 
  
https://www.epa.gov/emc
 

NO METHOD is indicatedwith DNPH-Silica or other similar support
 

It's clear is not an alternative national or international or industrial counterpart to measure chimney in formaldehyde or acrolein and therefore does not comply with the provisions of UNI CEN TS 15675 of 2008 and EN ISO / IEC 17025, see the first with regard to Annexes A and C and see the second for the concept of "scope".
 
This does not conform to the principles of Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) or to the European Commission's MMR Guideline No. 5 of 2012 and is not even in line (and specifically for formaldehyde and in analogy for acrolein) with the JRC Reference Report on Monitoring of Emissions to Air and Water from 2018 IED Installations:
 
http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/[…]/ROM_2018_08_20.pdf
 
of which we report appropriate table (ANNEX 7) from which to choose suitable methods for formaldehyde. EPA M 0011 (in the JRC table for formaldehyde together with other NCASI and CARB methods) must not be confused with EPA TO-11A used in Emilia Romagna as one is an impinger DNPH method (specifically applicable for formaldehyde and other selected carbonyls) and the other is an exclusive ambient air method (with the exception of automobile emission) that uses Silice-DNPH cartridge (the florisil support is not expected even if some suppliers sell DNPH-florisil for EPA to-11A against what is provided by the method) as indicated in Section 1 of:
 
https://www.epa.gov/[…]/to-11a_list_of_known_needed_updates.pdf
 
where EPA also officially declares the demonstrated inapplicability to the acrolein analysis.

The unique acrolein National / Industry Standard recognized for Stationary Stack Emission fron Industry is the NCASI IM / CAM / WP 99.02 which, in analogy to what is indicated in the table presented, can be considered a Method compliant with the requirements of the BREF JRC Reference Report in the absence of specific National and International Technical Standards.
 

In addition, we note that there are laboratories in Italy accredited for acrolein ambient air with EPA to-11A and NIOSH 2018 against what is recognized on their inapplicability for the analysis of the same and laboratories accredited to chimney for some aldehydes with EPA TO-11A 1999 we ask if it is CONSIDERED OR LESS OUT OF APPLICATION FIELD, IT IS ALSO VALID FOR THE PURPOSE, EVEN IF THE ABOVE IS INDICATED IT MAKES IT DIFFICULTY APPLICABLE.


I write on behalf of Reality, recalling the principles of the Aahrus Convention because AIR SHALL NOT LIVE BY PAPER ALONE.

Rating
0
Last discussed by MdI
Nov 17, 2018 10:27 PM
+

MDeSilva3DPARS - Unmanned/Autonomous Technologies For Air, Land Lock Water Resources & Oceans Protection and Production Initiative
The objective is to develop unmanned/autonomous technologies for aiding Land Lock Water Resource & ocean protection and production. The technologies will be developed, tested and evaluated in collaboration with multiple partners by bringing together groups of experts from different fields. The work will involve using existing commercially available technological capabilities or technological capabilities that are ready for licensing from federal, academic and industry labs, which have not yet been applied for ocean protection and production. The technologies of interest may already be used in space commerce and space exploration applications or in military operations. The technological capabilities will be evaluated and then selected for their potential and their ability for being adapted for ocean protection and production. The technological capabilities will be translated by designing and engineering prototypes, testing, and evaluation of the technology prototypes. The engineering of prototypes may be from sustainable material and will involve using 3D printing and advanced robotics capabilities that are being used in manufacturing. The testing and evaluation of prototypes will be conducted that include the evaluation of the technological ability to monitor and sustain ocean production and on the ability to maintain ocean protection that may involve in bioremediation and other innovative mechanisms of ocean pollution removal. Implementing this commitment would mean that we will not only be able to support the blue economy, but also support education and training of the next generation on innovative technologies to protect our ocean. Find out more information at
https://oceanconference.un.org/commitments/?id=23654

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Nov 12, 2018 01:23 PM
+

samuelson I am seeking documentation on the spreadsheets of 'Specific CO2 emissions per tonne-km and per mode of transport in Europe, 1995-2011' downloadable at 'https://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/#tab-european-data'. Specifically, I am trying to understand what is included in the 'maritime' mode? Does this include domestic coastal shipping, inter-EU coastal shipping, and/or overseas shipping? Does it include both containers and bulk freight? The link given to the primary data source in the spreadsheet itself, 'TRENDS' (http://www.forum.europa.eu.int/[…]/environment_trends) does not work. Can anyone help me out? Thanks.

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Nov 14, 2018 09:38 AM
+

Protogerov My team recently launched a new “emission-free travel calculator”. The website calculates the emissions a vehicle produces when commuting to a certain destination and suggests alternative ways of transportation. You can explore and test the tool by yourself on the following link: https://missionemission.co/

A fascinating feature we have designed is that users can now discover the timespan that a tree will need to absorb the amount of emitted CO2 during a trip to a certain destination.

We have designed and developed the tool in order to raise awareness on the global pollution problem.

I would like to ask you for your help to engage with more people and raise awareness on the matter.

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Dec 10, 2018 05:04 PM
+

dparliar Good morning.
I would like to receive some extra information about the new European Air Quality Index, launched on November 2017 (
https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/air/air-quality-index).
I am o PhD student and I would like to add this inew index to my study. Could you please provide me with any information availiable?

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Dec 11, 2018 11:03 AM
+

MIBA 21. 12. 2018, 16:20
konec.predcasnym.umrtim@seznam.cz
Komu:
martin.kocica@finod.cz
PETICE - INFO A POSTUP.
DOBRÝ DEN.
JSTE SUPER, PRIMA, BEZVA PARTA !
POSÍLÁME VÁM "UPOUTÁVKU" - PETICE - INFO A POSTUP.
A AŽ TOTO PŘEČTETE A BUDETE S TÍM SOUHLASIT,
TAK TO, PROSÍME VÁS,
PŘEPOŠLETE A ŠIŘTE, KAM TO JEN PŮJDE !

konec.predcasnym.umrtim
.................................................................................................................

( FRANCIE AKTUÁLNĚ.
KOŠILE BLIŽŠÍ, NEŽ KABÁT?
KOŠILE BLIŽŠÍ, NEŽ ŽLUTÁ VESTA?

A SNAD, KAŽDÝ Z NÁS, MÁ SVOJI KOŠILY! )

TAK NEVÍME, JAK VY, ALE MY, MÁME TYTO OSOBNÍ ZKUŠENOSTI.
K VLASTNÍM OBČANŮM,
INSTITUCE JSOU - SLEPÝ, HLUCHÝ A NĚMÝ ! ! !

SKORO VŠECHNY,
NEJRŮZNĚJŠÍ INSTITUCE,
S KTERÝMI JSME ZAČALI A SNAŽILI, KOMUNIKOVAT,
těch, "odborníků", "úřadů", "ministerstev",
"sdělovacích prostředků",
NÁM DOPOSUD ANI NEODPOVĚDĚLI, NA NAŠE EMAILY ! ! !

ALE ÚPLNĚ VŠECHNY,
DOPOSUD ZABRAŇUJÍ,

INFORMOVAT, O "RYCHLÉ" MOŽNOSTI,
ČISTĚJŠÍHO PROVOZU, VELKÉHO MNOŽSTVÍ, SPALOVACÍCH MOTORŮ.
(osobní a nákladní automobily, traktory, kombajny, lokomotivy, čluny, lodě,
ale také různé motory, sekačky na trávu, pily ....)
 
MOŽNÁ Z DŮVODŮ, PŘEDNOSTI
"DLOUHODOBÉ", ČISTÉ MOBILITĚ ? ? ?
A NEBO,
Z "BYZNYSU", DLOUHODOBÉHO,
PLNĚNÍ VLASTNÍCH KAPES ? ? ?

ASI SE JIM NELÍBÍ NABÍZENÉ MOŽNOSTI:

Chcete, aby všichni výrobci a dodavatelé paliv,
začali používat v palivech, automaticky,
již v síti čerpacích stanic, vyzkoušené aditivum?
Patentovaný produkt, pro BENZÍN, NAFTU, LPG ???

KTERÝ TÍM BUDE, VŽDY, automaticky,
STÁLE PŘÍTOMEN, VE VŠECH MOTORECH A VOZIDLECH ? ? ?

A ZAJISTÍ, ČISTĚJŠÍ PROVOZ SPALOVACÍCH MOTORŮ ? ? ?
A TÍM, IHNED, STÁLÉ - SNÍŽENÍ EMISÍ CO2 ! ! !
CO - Oxid uhelnatý - (jedovatý plyn) je možné, snížit až o 80% !

HC - uhlovodíky - je možné, snížit až o 90% !

Prachové částice (saze - ohrožují zdraví) - je možné, snížit až o 50% !

Na to Vám,
téměř všichni obyvatelé, spoluobčané, podnikatelé,
odpoví: ANO!
 
Může se to stát? - Ano!
PROČ?

PROTOŽE TO:

1) bude bez rozdílu, pro všechny obyvatele, spoluobčany, podnikatele!
    Bude to pro jejich, velké zlepšení zdraví, prodloužení života,
    a obnovy přírody!

2) Pro mnoho obyvatel, spoluobčanů, podnikatelů,
     to snižuje nebo odstraňuje smog ve městech!

3) Pro mnoho obyvatel, spoluobčany, rodiny a podnikatele,
     
to bude mít také významný finanční účinek.

     Ušetří desítky až stovky tisíc peněz ročně!

    A zdraví všech lidí,
    A NAŠÍ PLANETY !!!

........................................................................................................

Všem lidem Země!
Chcete Vám a Vašim dětem, zdravý a emisemi nezkracovaný život?
(Jsou důležitější:
Změny ve fotbalové Spartě-? trest za extrémní týrání štěněte-?
odstoupení prezidenta-? vystoupení z Evropské unie-?....)

NE !
Protože:
Nejdůležitější a nejcennější, je lidský život a zdraví ! ! !

Každý už asi má, "svůj pohár", tak jako MY - naplněn!
Poslední kapkou, kdy už "NÁŠ pohár" přetekl,
je to z těchto důvodů:
1)
JSME PROTI:
DOSAVADNÍM, PŘEDČASNÝM ÚMRTÍM OBYVATEL!
ZDRAVOTNÍMU A FINANČNÍMU POŠKOZOVÁNÍ,
BEZ ROZDÍLU,
KAŽDÉHO OBYVATELE, KAŽDÉHO Z NÁS,
NAŠICH NEJBLIŽŠÍCH A NAŠICH DĚTÍ ! ! !
 
JSME PROTI:
POKRAČUJÍCÍMU ZNEČIŠŤOVÁNÍ OVZDUŠÍ,
A NAVYŠUJÍCÍM PROBLÉMŮM S OTEPLOVÁNÍM PLANETY.
 
JSME PROTI:
VŠEM INSTITUCÍM, KTERÉ DOPOSUD ZABRAŇUJÍ,
INFORMOVAT, O "RYCHLÉ" MOŽNOSTI,
ČISTĚJŠÍHO PROVOZU, VELKÉHO MNOŽSTVÍ, SPALOVACÍCH MOTORŮ.
 
MOŽNÁ Z DŮVODŮ, PŘEDNOSTI "DLOUHODOBÉ", ČISTÉ MOBILITY ?
A NEBO,
Z BYZNYSU DLOUHODOBÉHO, PLNĚNÍ VLASTNÍCH KAPES ?


V roce 2018 - BYLO PŘEDČASNÝCH ÚMRTÍ,
400 000 Evropanů a 11 000 obyvatel České republiky!



TO JE, V EU, VČETNĚ ČR, PŘEDČASNÁ SMRT,



VÍCE JAK 1000, SPOLUOBČANŮ DENNĚ ! ! !


Víme, že teď, a i stále,
má každý, plno problémů a starostí,
o sebe, o děti, o vnoučata,
ale můžeme si říct, dokud ještě,
na 100% - nejde přímo o život - tak to je ještě dobrý ! ! !

ALE:
Nejdůležitější a nejcennější, je stále, lidský život a zdraví ! ! !
 
A co když jde, o životy a zdraví?
To se týká jen "těch jiných, ostatních"?
To se netýká nás? Našich dětí? A našich blízkých?



V ČR ročně, 11000 předčasných úmrtí!

A poškozování lidských plodů! Zvýšený výskyt astmatu!
Dýchacích potíží a rakoviny plic!

A to se týká všech!
To se týká nás,
našich dětí, našich blízkých!


PROTO TEĎ BYLA ZVEŘEJNĚNA TATO PETICE !

..................................................................................................

PETICE - INFO A POSTUP.
ZDE JE MALÁ UKÁZKA A PAK, JAK SE DO PETICE DOSTAT.

Vážení,
• V ČR je k dispozici vyzkoušené aditivum, které má mnohem lepší účinky.
• Čistí vnitřní části motoru, vstřiky, ventily, čidla, katalyzátory i výfukový
systém, včetně filtrů pevných částic !
• Snižuje emise (PM a CO), přímo ohrožující zdraví obyvatel !

• Snižuje spotřebu paliva (obvykle 5-8%), po delším používání až 15%! ! !
A tím, prodlužuje dojezd, vašich vlastních i všech vozidel,
a snižuje emise CO2 ! ! !
(osobní a nákladní automobily, traktory, kombajny, lokomotivy, čluny, lodě,
ale také různé motory, sekačky na trávu, pily ....)

Vše je zaručeno! Garantováno!

Použití vynálezu!
Patent schválen!

Chcete, aby všichni výrobci a dodavatelé paliv,
začali používat v palivech, automaticky,
již v síti čerpacích stanic, vyzkoušené aditivum?
Patentovaný produkt, pro BENZÍN, NAFTU, LPG ???

KTERÝ TÍM BUDE, VŽDY, automaticky,
STÁLE PŘÍTOMEN, VE VŠECH MOTORECH A VOZIDLECH ? ? ?
A TÍM, IHNED, STÁLÉ - SNÍŽENÍ EMISÍ CO2 ! ! !

Na to Vám,
téměř všichni obyvatelé, spoluobčané, podnikatelé,
odpoví: ANO!
 
Může se to stát? - Ano!
PROČ?

PROTOŽE TO:

1) bude bez rozdílu, pro všechny obyvatele, spoluobčany, podnikatele!
    Bude to pro jejich, velké zlepšení zdraví, prodloužení života,
    a obnovy přírody!

2) Pro mnoho obyvatel, spoluobčanů, podnikatelů,
     to snižuje nebo odstraňuje smog ve městech!

3) Pro mnoho obyvatel, spoluobčany, rodiny a podnikatele,
     to bude mít také významný finanční účinek.

     Ušetří desítky až stovky tisíc peněz ročně!

    A zdraví všech lidí,
    A NAŠÍ PLANETY !!!

DĚKUJEME PŘEDEM, ZA VAŠE ZODPOVĚDNÉ,

PODEPSÁNÍ TÉTO PETICE - PRO ZDRAVOU BUDOUCNOST ! ! !

 .............................................................................................................

VÁŽENÍ,
ZDE JE POSTUP, SOUHLASU S TEXTEM PETICE A PODPISU.
1) NÍŽE - KLEPNĚTE MYŠÍ NA NÁZEV PETICE.

 ZDRAVÉ DĚTI? KONEC EMISÍM! KONEC PŘEDČASNÝCH SMRTÍ! ZDRAVÝ SVĚT! ZDRAVÍ LIDÉ! END OF EMISSIONS! THE END OF PREVIOUS DEATH! HEALTHY WORLD! HEALTH PEOPLE!
 

2) UPROSTŘED JE TEXT PETICE, NA PRAVÉ STRANĚ - VYPLNIT ÚDAJE O VÁS.

                                                                                               JMÉNO PŘÍJMENÍ

                                                                                               STÁT MĚSTO

                                                                                                NEVYPLNIT NEBO VYPLNIT

                                                                                                PODEPISUJI, PROTOŽE....

ZAŠKRTNOUT TŘI, MALÉ ČTVEREČKY,

PŘED TĚMITO TŘEMI TEXTY

Zveřejnit můj podpis
Dovoluji autorovi petice předat můj podpis subjektům s rozhodovací pravomocí
Přijímám Podmínky služby a Zásady ochrany soukromí.
3) KLEPNOUT MYŠÍ NA ČTVEREC - NEJSEM ROBOT

    A PO OZNAČENÍ, SPRÁVNÝCH OBRÁZKŮ,

    KLIKNOUT DOLE NA - OVĚŘIT.

    PŘI NESPRÁVNÉM OZNAČENÍ OBRÁZKŮ,

    SE ZOBRAZÍ, NOVÁ SKUPINA OBRÁZKŮ K OZNAČENÍ,

    A TO TOLIKRÁT, DOKUD NEBUDE

    VE ČTVERCI - NEJSEM ROBOT - ZELENÝ HÁČEK!

4) PAK KLEPNOUT MYŠÍ NA - PODEPSAT.

5) ZOBRAZÍ SE ZELENÝ PRUH, POTVRZUJÍCÍ SPRÁVNÝ POSTUP PODPISU PETICE.

6) POD NADPISEM PETICE, KLEPNĚTE MYŠÍ NA - PODPISY,

    KDE BY PAK UŽ MĚLO BÝT, ZA POŘADOVÝM ČÍSLEM, VAŠE JMÉNO.



DĚKUJEME, ZA VAŠE ZODPOVĚDNÉ,

PODEPSÁNÍ TÉTO PETICE - PRO ZDRAVOU BUDOUCNOST ! ! !

Rating
0
Last created by MIBA
Dec 26, 2018 02:42 AM
+

SV1GZ ENDANGERING THE INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR SAFETY & SECURITY BY BLOCKING COMMUNICATIONS AND INACTIVATION OF A NUCLEAR PHYSICIST WITH VERY RARE RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS ....


 VERY-URGENT (Because it concerns the International Nuclear Safety & Security,E.T.C.)

To: The Prosecutor of International Criminal Court & Prosecutions of [Supreme Criminal Court of Greece,Second instance Criminal Court in Athens,First Criminal Court in Athens]
c.c. The Royal Netherlands Embassy in Greece , Canadian Embassy in Greece , Others

From : Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear FISSION(Applied + Theoretically),Mikras Asias 13,Agios Nikolaos,Anavissou,19013 Attiki,Greece,
tel+fax: +30-2291055275 , Saturday-15-December-2018

BY COURT OWN MOTION,CONTINUOUS & IN THE ACT OF COMMITTING THE CRIME AGAINST THE LEGAL VALUE OF INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR SAFETY & SECURITY AND AGAINST LEGAL VALUES OF MR. JOSEPH-CHRISTOS KONDYLAKIS AND OTHERS...
                                                           Which concern :
[1] The Very-Urgent Law Action of Mr. Joseph-Christos Kondylakis of Tuesday-11-December-2018 AND Friday-14-December-2018 to the Prosecutions of [Supreme Criminal Court of Greece,Second instance Criminal Court in Athens,First Criminal Court in Athens] and International Criminal Court and concern BARRIERS in his communications (from tel+fax:+30-2291055275) to main (tel +43-1-2600-0 & fax +43-1-2600-7) of International “Atomic”(NUCLEAR!!) Energy Agency [I.A.E.A.],E.T.C.
[2] Crimes & Injustices ,E.T.C. which refer in the English version of my book “WAR FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF INTELLIGENCE” by Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,2018
[3] My document (send by fax & email) with title “FOR A UNIVERSITY' MASTER DEGREE IN NUCLEAR FISSION(APPLIED+THEORETICALLY) (from this author experience at McGill University,Canada in 1976-1978 ) dated Friday-16-November-2018 and his C.V. with its CD of July 2014 of Mr. Joseph-Christos Kondylakis.
[4] I am the first internationally that published its first Quantitative! scientific research entitled “Theoretically and under very special applied conditions a Nuclear fission reactor may explode as Nuclear Bomb”,published in the proceedings of 19th scientific symposium of the Hellenic Nuclear Physics Society,held at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,Greece on May 2010,also exist in Internet site:
http://inspirehep.net/record/1441083/files/Fulltext.pdf
[5] My relevant communications with the Criminal ProsecutionS in Athens,Greece, Royal Netherlands Embassy in Greece,International Criminal Court & Elsewhere...
[6] (Added latter): My fax & email of Wednesday-26-December-2018 concerning ΠΚ292Α,E.T.C.

   Because as consequence of the criminal acts which are mentioned in my very-urgent law actions [1],[2] the International legal Value of International Nuclear Safety & Security suffer Additional significant Endangering,Continuously, from the time that Barriers have been put in the communications of Mr. Joseph-Christos Kondylakis with I.A.E.A. (ref. [1]+[2]+[3]+[4]+[5]+[6]) and Elsewhere and his Inactivation [5] ,E.T.C. , AND
   Because ,in opinion of this writer, in the International “Atomic”(NUCLEAR!!) Energy Agency ,very probably do NOT exist (or it exist extremely few) Nuclear Physicists specialized in Nuclear FISSION(Applied+Theoretically) AND who have seriously studied the serious scientific books mentioned in [3] AND who have educated in practice for Nuclear Fission Power Plants AND who to have a very many sciences knowledge (which contribute to holistic perception of reality) AND who have graduated with “Excellent” degree from University and have done post-graduate studies with full foreign scholarship AND because E.T.C.
For the above reasons act the necessary Immediately, by court own motion,in the act of committing the crime(s),E.T.C.,...

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jan 07, 2019 03:47 PM
+

SV1GZ URGENT AND VITAL NUCLEAR SAFETY & SECURITY CRIMES AND RELATED VITAL CRIMES,E.T.C.

      URGENT(Because it concern the International Nuclear Energy Safety & Security) [Pages : 4 ]

To: United Nations(General Assembly,Security Council),I.C.C.,Criminal Prosecutions[Supreme Court of Greece,Second instance Criminal Court in Athens,First instance Criminal Court in Athens], INTERPOL,EUROPOL,EUROJUST,Embassies of Nations,International “Atomic”(NUCLEAR!!) Energy Agency,EURATOM,Others...

From: Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear FISSION(Applied + Theoretically),Mikras Asias 13,Agios Nikolaos,Anavissou,19013 Attiki,Greece,
tel+fax: +30-2291055275 , Saturday-12-January-2019

        Your relevant references are the following(and this document is relevant to the following:):
[1] The Very-Urgent Law Action of Mr. Joseph-Christos Kondylakis of Tuesday-11-December-2018 AND Friday-14-December-2018 to the Prosecutions of [Supreme Criminal Court of Greece,Second instance Criminal Court in Athens,First Criminal Court in Athens] and International Criminal Court which concern BARRIERS in his communications (from tel+fax:+30-2291055275) to main (tel +43-1-2600-0 & fax +43-1-2600-7) of International “Atomic”(NUCLEAR!!) Energy Agency [I.A.E.A.],E.T.C.
[2] The book “WAR FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF INTELLIGENCE” by Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,2019 (to be published in about 3 months from my publisher : fylatos.com ,and then to be available in international & national Internet bookstores & bookstores)
[3] I am the first internationally that published its first Quantitative! scientific research entitled “Theoretically and under very special applied conditions a Nuclear fission reactor may explode as Nuclear Bomb”,published in the proceedings of 19th scientific symposium of the Hellenic Nuclear Physics Society,held at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,Greece on May 2010,also exist in Internet site:
http://inspirehep.net/record/1441083/files/Fulltext.pdf
[4] The book “Handbook on Nuclear Law” by International “Atomic” Energy Agency , 2003
[5] My relevant communications with the Criminal ProsecutionS in Athens,Greece, Royal Netherlands Embassy in Greece, Canadian Embassy in Greece,International Criminal Court & Elsewhere...

Our Theme is : FACILITATING NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE(S) BY BLOCKING VITAL COMMUNICATIONS CONCERNING NUCLEAR SAFETY & SECURITY AND SO MAKING THE CRIME OF ENDAGERING HUMANITY & PLANET EARTH TO NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE(S) AND OTHER RELATED CRIMES[2],E.T.C., ...

   Considering the relevant definitions,Responsibilities and Critical information from the “Handbook of Nuclear Law” published by the International “Atomic” Energy Agency [4] we relevantly mention :

[4],p.4, Definition of Nuclear Law:
The body of special legal norms created to regulate the conduct of legal
or natural persons engaged in activities related to fissionable materials,
ionizing radiation and exposure to natural sources of radiation.

[4],p. 5, Simply stated, the primary objective of nuclear law is:
To provide a legal framework for conducting activities related to nuclear
energy and ionizing radiation in a manner which ADEQUATELY protects
individuals, property and the environment

[4], p.5. 1.4.1. Safety Principle : which include the VITAL “PREVENTION PRINCIPLE” and the “PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE”, BOTH of which are Very Relevant to our THEME(S) and reference [3]+[1]+[2]+[5]...

[4],p.6, 1.4.2. Security Principle : Very Relevant to our THEME(S) & ref. [3]+[5]+[1].

[4],p. 7, 1.4.3. Responsibility Principle : “Who is primarily responsible for ensuring safety?” In a sense, of course, ALL entities having some control over a nuclear related activity bear at least part of the responsibility for safety. It is obviously understood that the International “Atomic” Energy Agency has the Primary International Responsibility and so Relevant are ref. [1]+[2]+[3]+[4]+[5].

[4],p. 8, 1.4.7. Sustainable Development Principle : A number of instruments in the field of environmental law have identified a duty for each generation not to impose undue burdens on future generations...in applying the sustainable
development principle in the nuclear field has been to urge that the current
generation does whatever is possible for long term safety...and here relevant ref. [3]+[1]+[2]+[4]+[5].

[4], p. 9, 1.4.8. Compliance Principle : a principle of customary international law has emerged to the effect that the territory of a State must not be used in such a way as to cause damage in another State and that, consequently, control measures are necessary...and here relevant are ref. [3]+[1]+[2]+[4]+[5].

[4],p. 10, 1.4.10. Transparency Principle : the transparency principle requires that bodies involved in the development, use and regulation of nuclear energy make available all relevant information concerning how nuclear energy is being used, particularly concerning incidents and abnormal occurrences that could have an impact on public health, safety and the environment....here relevant are the Vital violation of Blocking/Stopping the TWO ways communications of a Very Critical Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear FISSION(Applied+ Theoretically) with the International “Atomic” Energy Agency, our references [1]+[3]+[2]+[4]+[5].

[4], p. 10, 1.4.11. International Cooperation Principle : It is VITAL to achieving improvements in the safety of nuclear activities and facilities worldwide that such lessons be promptly and WIDELY SHARED!!. Second, the use of nuclear material involves security risks that do not respect national borders... Here relevant are ref. [3]+[2]+[1]+[4]+[5].

        Also relevant to our references [1]+[3]+[2]+[4+[5]] are the following parts from [4]:

[4],p.15, 1.5.3. Input!! from STAKEHOLDERS... : I am a Stakeholder! , because stakeholders have typically included the following: the regulated industry or
PROFESSIONALS ; SCIENTIFIC bodies; governmental agencies (local, regional and national) whose responsibilities arguably cover nuclear energy; the media; the public (individuals, community groups and interest groups); and other States
(especially neighbouring States that have entered into agreements providing
for an exchange of information concerning possible transboundary impacts, or
States involved in the export or import of certain technologies or material)...
and ref [3]+[1]+[2]+[4]+[5].

[4],p.19, 1.5.7. Legislative Oversight : TOO OFTEN, after a difficult and contentious effort to enact nuclear legislation has been concluded, the legislative body moves on to other matters and fails to monitor the practical impact of its lawmaking...Here the creator of this “Handbook of Nuclear Law” the International “Atomic” Energy Agency Vitally Fail to enforce its own Nuclear Law by its own personnel ,due f.e. to ref. [1]+[3]+[2]+[4+[5]] which clearly indicate Very Serious Failure! In its capabilities(Scientific & Legal)...

[4],p. 19 , 1.5.8. Relations to non-nuclear laws : When nuclear legislation is being drafted, legislators must consider the impact that national legal requirements in non-nuclear fields may have on achieving the objectives of the legislation...Here is VITAL!! to consider the “WAR FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF INTELLIGENCE” as in our references [2]+[5]+[3]+[4]+[1].

[4],p. 20, 1.5.9. Reflecting international conventions or treaties in national legislation : As a matter of international law, States that take the necessary steps
under their national laws to approve (or ratify) such an instrument are then
bound by the obligations arising out of that instrument in their relations with
other States Parties (assuming that the instrument has entered into force)... and here are relevant our ref. [4]+[3]+[1]+[2]+[5].

[4], p. 22, SECURITY CULTURE AND SAFETY CULTURE IN NUCLEAR LAW....
Here are relevant our ref. [3]+[2]+[1]+[5]+[4].

[4],p.30, 2.3.6. Public Information : most regulatory bodies have programmes for the provision
of information to other stakeholders (the public, the media, the legislature,
local government and industry) about issues and activities relevant to nuclear
and radiation safety. Indeed, public confidence that nuclear material and
techniques are being used safely is closely linked to the regulatory body’s track
record of providing PROMPT, accurate and complete information on such issues and activities....relevant are our ref. [1]+[3]+[2]+[5]+[4].

[4]. p. 31, 2.3.7. Co-ordination with other bodies : The use of nuclear energy has become a truly GLOBAL!! activity... relevant are our ref. [3]+[1]+[2]+[5]+[4].

[4], p. 31, 2.4. ADVISORY BODIES AND EXTERNAL SUPPORT...VERY SERIOUS CRIMINAL VIOLATION due to our ref. [1]+[3]+[2]+[5]+[4].

[4], from p. 63 , Chapter 6 SAFETY OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES...VITAL relevant is our ref. [3]+[2]+[1]+[5]+4].

[4], from p. 75 , Chapter 7 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE...VITAL relevant is our ref. [3]+[2]+[1]+[5]+4].
[4], from p. 119 , Part V NON-PROLIFERATION AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION
...VITAL relevant is our ref. [2]+[3]+[5}+[1]+[4].

In general in ALL text of the reference [4] are relevant our ref. [1]+[3]+[2]+[5].

Because of the above mentioned and because the Human factor (directly or/and indirectly) is the First!! cause in Nuclear Accidents and Nuclear Catastrophes and because of Very Serious ILL-Functions of International “Atomic” (NUCLEAR!!!) Energy Agency and Others Nuclear Safety & Security Organizations , we ask Urgently FULL investigations of our THEME(S) and ,as a clear indicative case,to Fully Investigate the life of this author in Greece,Canada & Europe, considering also ref. [5] ,and then the Fastest possible correct the malfunctions in Nuclear Safety & Security in national & international considerations and its extensions to consideration of crimes as such as referred in [2]+[5] (and very carefully studying also their references and the references of references and so on) and offering Justice(considering a possible continuous! Crime) by punishing the responsible Criminals and offering restoration to the national and international victims,and also by taking extremely good care in PREVENTION so Not to occur similar cases in the future as these described in [1]+[2]+[5] (and their references and references of references and so on) , because with the existing Science(s) & Technology(ies) and the Evil minds that are in the Top governance of planet Earth[5], the ultimate Destruction of Humanity & planet Earth is Possible! in future..., E.T.C....







 

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jan 14, 2019 03:40 PM
+

DanteMaschio doubts about the reported data on the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD)

Hello,

I am working on a database based on the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD) data reported by the EU Member States. Here there are some doubts I can not solve with the information available on the EEA website.

General questions:
- Can we understand Individual Appropriate System (IAS) as an on-site treatment?
- According to the descriptions of the updated tables on the web now the number of real inhabitants is reported in the agglomeration table. However these data are not up to date. It will be available?

In relation to some tables:
1. T_UWWTPs:
(uwwloadentering) Is there a possibility to have the influence flow in m3 /d?
(uwwstate) How can I understand the inactive and temporarily inactive state for each uwwtps point?
(uwwdateclosing and uwwendlife) Could I understand that records prior to the current date are points that are no working now?
(uwwotherteatment) Which is the difference between Tertiary treatment (UV, Cl, O3,…) and Other – more stringent treatment?
(uwwperformance) How can I understand the Not Relevant registers?

2. T_agglomerations
(agglstate) How can I understand the inactive or temporarily inactive state for each agglomeration?
(aggendlife) What it meant that an agglomeration has reached its end of life?

3. T_UWWTPAgglom
When it is an imperative to report the relationship UWWTPs:Agglomeration?

4. T_UWWdischargepoints
(dcpstate) How can I understand the inactive and temporarily inactive state of a discharge point?

5. T_UWWemissionload:
Why there is so little information about the polluting charges (BOD, COD, TSS) that come in and out of UWWTPs?


I would also be useful if you can send me the Spanish contact who report and work on the data related to this directive.

Thanks,

Dante

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Feb 26, 2019 12:06 PM
+

ecsliuhm Dear EEA team:
When I tried to download hourly Pm2.5 series of Brussel from
http://discomap.eea.europa.eu/map/fme/AirQualityExport.htm, the request URL generated the following request http://fme.discomap.eea.eur[…]utput=TEXT&UpdateDate=.
However, after I clicked download, I did not receive any file list.

Could you please help me with this?

many thanks

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Feb 26, 2019 12:37 PM
Rating
0
Last discussed by tatykr
Jan 18, 2016 11:01 AM
+

Vick Issue with the Air Indicator Downloading Service - days with few or no data

Hello EEA team,

We usually use the web service at the URL
 
http://discomap.eea.europa.eu/[…]/execute
with our own token, and we have noticed that some days the web service gives only an empty file as if they were no new measurement over the world for those days.

For example, we have no data from 2015-08-07 until now (2015-08-11).
We also had no data from 2015-07-16 to 2015-07-18.
Some other days seems to have only few data, like on 2015-07-15.

Why is there some days with no data, some days with few data ?
If it's a technical problem, will it be fixed soon ?

Regards,
Vincent

Rating
0
Last discussed by Vick
Sep 04, 2015 04:57 PM
 
Loading