– or –
Please login or register to participate.
.
 
+

sbalasub EDGAR emissions data unavailable at http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu. How can we access available time-series data by pollutant classification for EDGAR 2012 database? Thanks!

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 31, 2019 12:01 PM
+

BilalT Hello there,
 I downloaded the EU soil polygon data from the following link,
https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/soil-type, but the soil type is mentioned only by Soil ID and I can not find the Soil ID description, means which ID present which soil type. Could you please tell me where to find this information?

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 31, 2019 11:33 AM
+

Moon Hi, I am searching for the average CO2 emission by large manufacturers in Europe (https://www.eea.europa.eu/d[…]-manufacturer-5#tab-chart_2). It seems like EEA does not provide 2018 figures yet...so I found a raw data which turned out to have around 15mn rows and, thus, cannot be analyzed using Excel.

When does EEA plan to provide average CO2 emission by large manufacturers in 2018? Or is there a way for me to know this information?

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 30, 2019 02:54 PM
+

erlabrousse Bonjour,Monsieur Labrousse
 

 

 En réponse à votre sollicitation,
 

 
Je vous confirme que tout arrêt de station en France doit faire l'objet d'une confirmation auprès des instances nationales qui elles mêmes font le relai auprès de la communauté européenne. De nombreuses stations permettent la validation des réglementations au niveau communautaire.
 

 

 

La station d'Iraty était une station dite rurale nationale qui permet d'avoir une information en dehors de toute activité humaine. Elle a été fermée pour des questions techniques compte tenu notamment de la présence d'une station sur le Limousin qui elle fonctionne 365 jours / an (contre uniquement l'été pour Iraty). Cette station sur la commune de La Nouaille (23) mesure notamment l'ozone. Les niveaux sont globalement comparables puisque le positionnement répond aux mêmes critères. L'ozone est effectivement un polluant qui impacte l'indice de la qualité de l'air mais les niveaux généralement obtenus sont de moindre ampleur que par le passé. Les polluants regardés très fortement aujourd'hui en France sont notamment pour les polluants dits "classiques" les particules, et les NOx en situation de proximité automobile notamment.
 

 

 

En espérant avoir répondu à vos attentes
 

Bien cordialement
 

 

 

Rémi FEUILLADE
 

Directeur Délégué Production et Exploitation

 

 

 

Bien evidement que l ozone s'aggrave en pollution de fond chaque annnée car il n'existe aucune mesure pour le depassement de l ozone sur le seuil de 100µG/M3 d'air sur 8h de 12H à 20H Le fait de retirer volontairement Iraty le demontre sans l 'accord de la Commission Européenne

 

 

 

24 JUILLET 2019 AMBES
Polluant / Heure 13h 14h 15h 16h 17h 18h 19h 20h 21h 22h 23h 0h 1h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 7h 8h 9h 10h 11h 12h
dioxyde d'azote (NO2) (µg/m3) 4 5 7 7 6 5 6 5 5 8 10 9 10 8 6 7 9 6 (8) (15) (14) (11) (8) -
ozone (O3) (µg/m3) 98 115 155 158 142 135 139 138 121 106 97 85 72 70 86 83 67 72 (72) (64) (69) (81) (95) -

Polluant / Heure 13h 14h 15h 16h 17h 18h 19h 20h 21h 22h 23h 0h 1h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 7h 8h 9h 10h 11h 12h
ozone (O3) (µg/m3) 122 120 123 125 123 124 126 119 116 110 109 108 111 115 114 117 120 120 118 (106) (117) (116) (118) -
MERA
 
Principaux polluants mesurés :
ozone (O3) :
depuis le 04-09-200

Brive Centre

Polluant / Heure 13h 14h 15h 16h 17h 18h 19h 20h 21h 22h 23h 0h 1h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 7h 8h 9h 10h 11h 12h
dioxyde d'azote (NO2) (µg/m3) 11 7 4 4 4 8 10 9 6 11 11 9 6 6 6 7 6 10 18 (25) (25) (23) (6) -
ozone (O3) (µg/m3) 141 129 119 124 127 127 129 125 117 96 77 74 77 74 67 63 64 59 51 (44) (56) (83) (109)

Bassens pres de Bordeaux

 

ozone (O3) (µg/m3) 108 136 126 124 132 141 137 130 127 115 98 102 102 94 106 101 98 81 (69) (71) (79) (89) (95
Vous pouvez constater des incoherence pour la surveillance de l air de la Nouvelle region Aquitaine

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 26, 2019 11:36 AM
+

erlabrousse Nouvelle escrologie à l histoire et au climat sous l heure d'ete des vaincus : http://labousseerick.canalblog.com/[…]/37515357.html
Les pluies acides hno3 sont un fleau et une calamite pour les eaux de baignades et pourquoi cet oubli..

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 26, 2019 11:15 AM
+

ant Dear all,

I have some questions regarding the consistency of the data published in CO2_passengers_cars_v17_csv.zip (Monitoring of CO2 emissions from passenger cars,
https://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/co2-cars-emission-16).
I know the data is marked as "provisional", but nonetheless I'd like to do some analysis with it. I apologize if there is any better place to ask these questions and I’d be thankful for any relating hints.

1) Several entries of the field Mh (Manufacturer name EU standard denomination) contain the word "Duplicate". Does this mean that the corresponding data row should be omitted in the analysis (e.g. when calculating average CO2 emissions)? If so, why are they published?
For example, see data row 6747 (ID 14555502). All entries are identical to the preceding row except for the fields Mh, Mp, VFN, Ewltp and Vf.

2) As in the previous example, emission data originating from apparently identical vehicle types may differ significantly. For example, the data in row 1749 and 1750 (ID 14560585/6) only differ in the NEDC and WLTP emission figures, i.e. 149 vs 160g/km and 173 vs 184g/km, respectively. What may cause this discrepancy?

Rating
0
Last discussed by ant
Jul 19, 2019 03:09 PM
+

Ferrario70 I can't understand the difference between this 2 maps:
MAP 1 -
https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/air/air-quality-index
MAP 2 - https://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/up-to-date-air-quality-data
In MAP2 you have NOT data of PM10, how you can calculate, for the same time and date the AQI in MAP1 ???
Please let me understand the difference.
Best regards, Max Ferrario

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 18, 2019 03:42 PM
+

rdubbeldeman Dear EEA,

I have an information request.
Could you please tell me what would be the correct EU ESD emissions for the year 2016. I found two different numbers on the EEA website on pages that have been updated around the same time.
The first source :
• ETS, ESD, LULUCF and aviation emission trends and projections, 1990-2035 (Last modified 30 Nov 2018)
https://www.eea.europa.eu/d[…]viation-1#tab-based-on-data
• Displayed ESD emissions 2016: 2.540,71 mt
The second source:
• Greenhouse gas emissions under the Effort Sharing Decision (ESD) last modified 23 Nov 2019
- https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/esd-1
• Displayed ESD emissions 2016: 2.554,99 mt
Both source seem to be updated fairly recently. So I would very much appreciate it if you could explain the difference and tell me what would be the correct ESD emission data for the EU.
Also, could you tell me when the ESD emission for the year 2017 will be known and published (not the proxy)?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Renee

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 15, 2019 04:25 PM
 
Loading