Notifications
Get notifications on new reports and products. Frequency: 3-4 emails / month.
Subscriptions
Sign up to receive our reports (print and/or electronic) and quarterly e-newsletter.
Follow us
Twitter iconTwitter
Facebook iconFacebook
YouTube iconYouTube channel
RSS logo RSS Feeds
More

Write to us Write to us

For the public:


For media and journalists:

Contact EEA staff
Contact the web team
FAQ

Call us Call us

Reception:

Phone: (+45) 33 36 71 00
Fax: (+45) 33 36 71 99


next
previous
items

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sound and independent information
on the environment

– or –
Please login or register to participate.
.
 
+

abhinavkumarvats Sir as it has been a matter of debate since long i thought consulting the ultimate is the best choice.Sir i wanna know if humans are the only and root cause of global warming.Because sir as you can see most of the heat is retained my the gas methane and methane gas emissions are very higher in nature than humans.All the swamp volcano etc. keep on emitting methane along with other gases causing global warming and if it is considered that humans deforest due to which the gases are not absorb then i ask how can the trees absorb methane sulfur dioxide and methane.If it is taken that although co2 causes comparatively less global warming than other gases but due to its large amount it is affecting the earth then i would love to ask that about a million years ago when the earth was in ice age then there were 10 times more co2 but still the ice age persisted only to diminish much later and if it is said that co2 was in dry ash form in ice age then how come earth enter ice age at first didn't the 10 times more co2 prevented it from entering the ice age. And sir what we are telling global warming can't it actually be one of the heating cycles of the earth .We all know after the formation of earth 45 million years it has gone through many heating and cooling cycles.Another topic is that the temperatures observed now is the highest recorded in all the heating cycles of earth .At this i question the accuracy of thermometers millions of years age and they wee even not present at that time.Sir i seek answers for my questions i guess you can surely help me out very well as sir i regard you as the best .Please sir reply at the earliest.

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Aug 15, 2014 10:27 AM
+

pagliasofia Hello! I am checking the Corine Land online Viewer (http://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/land-accounts). I've noticed that the tables for the CLC1990 and CLC2006 data show a "No data" entry, while the CLC200= data do not. My questions are: (1) Why is it so? (2) What does the "No data" entry stems for, and (3) what is it due to? Thank you very much, sofia p.

Rating
0
Last discussed by pagliasofia
Jul 15, 2014 02:43 PM
+

pagliasofia Good Morning,
I have downloaded the urban morphological zones (UMZ) data for 2000 and 2006. For UMZ 2000, the vector layer "UMZ2000_Pop50000Names.shp" is available at
http://www.eea.europa.eu/da[…]mz2000-f1v0-1#tab-gis-data. In contrast, this layer is not available for UMZ 2006. I have 2 questions: I8) Why is it so? And (ii) is it possible to have it also for 2006? Thank you very much.

Rating
+1
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 11, 2014 10:54 AM
 
Loading