EEA FORUM
+
rcooper
Hi there,
rcooper
Hi there,
I noticed that the GEMET client (listed at bottom of http://svn.eionet.europa.eu/[…]/GEMETWebServiceAPI) is no longer functioning. It appears that eionet content has moved and the links in GemetClient.js therefore need updating. I'd be grateful for any suggestions on how to resolve. Thanks, Richard.
Start of GemetClient.js file:
var ThesaurusReader=function(config){this.INSPIRE="http://inspire.jrc.it/[…]/";this.appPath="";if(config.appPath){this.appPath=config.appPath;}
this.url="http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/
+
cristea_csmn Hello, in Romania, pallets are considered to be tertiary packaging. This product can be reused over and over again. I think that it can be excepted from the application of the 94/62/CE directive. What do you think? Can you give court practice examples? How is the 94/62/\CE directive applyed in other E.U member countries?
+
njetil
Hello,
njetil
Hello,
I am trying to implement a life cycle model of transport air emissions. I read the very consistent report "EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook — 2009, Exhaust emissions from road transport", and I do not find any consideration about load factor. It is an important parameter in air emission per road vehicules. Is it underlying in emissions factor ? How can I include the load factor parameter ? Could I convert your emission factor in tons/km ?
Thanks a lot for your answer.
+
marei
Hello, I live in the province of Gipuzkoa (Basque Country). Our last provincial government had a waste management plan, which included, along with other measures, the building of an incinerator. But our new provincial government totally opposes the incinerator and they say they want to make Gipuzkoa the "zero waste land" and the european leader in recycling with 80 percent recycling rates.
marei
Hello, I live in the province of Gipuzkoa (Basque Country). Our last provincial government had a waste management plan, which included, along with other measures, the building of an incinerator. But our new provincial government totally opposes the incinerator and they say they want to make Gipuzkoa the "zero waste land" and the european leader in recycling with 80 percent recycling rates.
Last week our Environment deputy said that 'he was very pleased with the decision taken by the Environment Commitee of the European Parliament on 25th April, because it is in favour of zero waste policy'. He also said that 'the Commitee defends the gradual disappearance of incinerators and landfilling, and that the decision of the Commitee will probably be ratified by the Plenary in May'. He has also said that incinerators will be banned in the European Union in the short term. Is all that true? I've been searching for the text of the before mentioned Commitee decision to see what it exactly says but I haven't been able to find it. Could you please help me? I would also like to know if there's a document which shows the European Union waste management policy quite clearly because there a lot of people here who don't know what to believe.
+
CarlvD
Hello,
CarlvD
Hello,
I’m a student in European Studies (political science) at the European University Frankfurt (Oder). I’m writing my Master thesis on the topic of EU agencies, with a focus on the EEA.
Could you provide me information on the history of the EEA and maybe the legal base of its creation?
Where could I get that information?
Thank you in advance,
Carl
+
insidestories Looking for Groundwater or Aquifer Maps for whole of EU like this one done by UK http://www.bgs.ac.uk/products/hydrogeology/maps.html - Does EEA have anything like this? Which individual Member States have? Doing Research for ethical and challenging future ecological requirements. Thanks for any help in this direction
+
Anilin
Hey,
Anilin
Hey,
I was looking in the EPER database and fond that it is pretty common the it is more the one industry at the same coordinate. I guess that it could happen in areas with lots of industries but the reason why I writing to you is that it seems a bit strange when they have the same emisson (EmissionValue). Do you have an ide why it looks that way? Can it be because the don't know exactly and is reporting an estimated value that turns out to be the same?
One example is Bernburg, Germany lat= 51.804351 long= 11.752974 that have an emission at 162000 for three different plants (year 2004).
Is there any reason for me to just use one of this to get a more correct picture of the situation?
Kind regards
A
+
pedromonteiro
Good morning:
Blog
Status Log
Wiki