– or –
Please login or register to participate.
.
 
+

saucerful There appears to be erroneous data in the Aviation Annex to EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2013, 1.A.3 found here:

http://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/1-a-3-a-aviation-annex

For example the B752 numbers have burn at 2500 and 3000 nautical miles to be 40632.981 and 23650.982 kg respectively. There are similar issues with the figures for JS32 and SW4 aircraft.

Rating
+1
Last discussed by pswiftct
Jul 27, 2015 01:28 PM
+

dlaurent Hello,

I'm very confused about two papers I can find on your website about "CO2 emissions from passenger transport".

1/
http://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/view

2/http://www.eea.europa.eu/[…]/specific-co2-emissions-per-passenger-3

I don't really understand why the results are very different. If I take for exemple "air transport". It's more or less 120 g/pkm in the second paper BUT 285 in the first one. Can you explain me why ?

At least, I'd like to know if "both of theses papers" consider all of different type of aircraft (if i take air transport), fuel and on which distance the estimation is made ?

Can we talk about an average of emission for transportation in europe ?

Thank you

Rating
+1
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 27, 2015 10:12 AM
+

dwalsh URBAN ATLAS QUESTION. Can someone help? I have downloaded shape files for a small number of cities from the excellent urban atlas (http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/urban-atlas). I want to use them to produce some simple comparative statistics for the cities (e.g. comparing the % of land within certain boundaries that are used for different purposes). However, when I open the shape files within ArcMap (version 10.1) the coordinate system is undefined. Thus, although I can see the data, I can't analyse it in relation to other boundaries/GIS data.

The meta data online says it does have a coordinate system but clearly ArcMap can't read it.

Can anyone help with this?

Thanks very much

Rating
0
Last discussed by dwalsh
Jul 22, 2015 10:51 AM
+

SV1GZ REPORTING NUCLEAR INCIDENT(S) TO INTERNATIONAL "ATOMIC" ENERGY AGENCY Incident Emergency Centre...
AND to European Environmental Agency for PREVENTION & CIVIL PROTECTION...

To: U.N.,I.C.C.’Prosecutor,International “atomic”(NUCLEAR!!!!) Energy,EURATOM,
European Authorities, Embassies of Nations, Interpol,Eurojust,Europol,Others…
Πρός τις Εισαγγελείες[Α.Π.+Εφετών+Πρωτοδικών] των Αθηνών+Ε.Υ.Π.+Ελλην. Αστυνομία+και Αλλους....
Και Σχετικόν της Μήνυσης μου πρός την Εισαγγελεία Πρωτοδικών Αθηνών Γ2015/799
Special c.c. : 1) Embassy of France in Greece 2) Canadian Embassy in Greece
             3) Royal Embassy of Netherlands in Greece 4) U.S.A. Embassy in Greece

From: Joseph-Christos Kondylakis,Nuclear Physicist/specialized in Nuclear FISSION (Applied+Theoretically) & with holistic perception in many sciences+technologies,
Former Assistant Technical Supervisor in the Nuclear Generation Division of “Ontario Hydro” in Canada and former Manager of Systems Design & Development in Canada, Mikras Asias 13, Agios Nikolaos , Anavissou, 19013 Attiki, Greece,
Tel+Fax:+30-22910-55275 , Tuesday-30-June-2015

NUCLEAR SAFETY CRITICAL!!! PROBLEMS IN NUCLEAR PLANTS (HUMAN FACTOR MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION)
Your ref: 1)
https://semfe.gr/forum/viewforum.php?f=21 2)the book “NUCLEAR ENERGY LEADERSHIP: Lessons Learned from U.S. Operators” by Mary Jo Rogers , 2013

A. The Nuclear Human!!! Factor is the FIRST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Cause in ALL!!! SEVERE Nuclear Accidents and in almost ALL Nuclear Accidents…
B. In initial extremely fast “look” inside the book with title “Nuclear Energy Leadership: Lessons Leaned from U.S. Operators” by Mary Jo Rogers,2013 our attention is focused in its page 95 in the Fig 7-1 “TYPICAL!!! Nuclear Power site Organizational structure-Senior Manager”…and Thinking in this TYPICAL!!!!!!!!!!! Organization structure of Nuclear Plants in U.S.A. & elsewhere(copying U.S.A.,etc) we consider this TYPICAL!!!! Organization structure of Nuclear plants HUGE!!! PROBLEM IN INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR SAFETY….
WHY?,BECAUSE in this Nuclear Organization structure is MISSING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The MOST CRITICAL!!!!!!!! Entity in The NUCLEAR SAFETY the ESSENCE!!!!!!!!!! of its Principles,Theories,Practices of Operations of a Nuclear System the PHYSICS!!!!!!!!!! Division Directorate(Director)!!!....with suggested its Managers in its lower Organization structures as 1) General Physics[Theoretical & Applied] Manager, 2) Nuclear Physics & Nuclear FISSION Manager , 3) Thermodynamic & Fluids Physics Manager , 3) Electronic Physics & Informatics Physics Manager , 4) Explosion Protection Physics & Chemistry Manager…S.O.S….S.O.S…S.O.S…S.O.S…S.O.S…S.O.S…S.O.S…S.O,S…
The most probable reasons for this HUGE!!! NUCLEAR UNSAFETY PROBLEMS we Think is the LACK!!! of Critical Specialized Qualifications in TOP!!! Management in Nuclear Systems that usually have the “qualification” of…navy, car dealers, finance,Political connections, E.T.C…S.O.S.
S.N.: To me, personally “They” create Huge! Problems so NOT to contribute to International Nuclear Safety as Very Much Delaying(More! than half of year) to receive my financial income , Stopping me to buy books from International Internet bookstores(my Visa credit card is blocked), E.T.C.,…S.O.S…

Rating
0
Last discussed by EEA
Jul 08, 2015 09:23 AM
+

lamdb Hello,
I would like to know why your sparql endpoint at
http://semantic.eea.europa.eu/sparql is not accessible today. Some days ago, I still can access it.

Thank you for assisting,
Lam

Rating
0
Last discussed by lamdb
Jun 24, 2015 09:36 AM
 
Loading